A Geographical Analysis of the Roadmap for Peace in the Middle East

In the past, geography had been one of main issues of conflict in the international community because having larger territories means having more wealth and power compared to other countries. In the early days, Spain was one of the main colonizers in our world history.

Due to the many territories that they had, Spaniards were considered rich. They have many lands to plant crop, for mining of minerals, and the likes. The competition of who and what territory was a big issue for most of the powerful states in the past. However, the concept of power through geographical location and territory is still present such as the conflict of Israel and Palestine.

The conflict of the Israel and Palestine penetrated the international community in the 1990’s. The conflict is a part of the widely known “Arab-Israeli” conflict. Basically, the dispute of Israel and Palestine is concerning land territory.

The two states have been claiming the land ever since and both of these state believe that they have authority over that land for many historical, religious and geographical.

Currently, the conflict of Israel and Palestine became more personal to both countries. Unlike the past, the whole conflict was related to the Arab and Israelites but now it is more focused on the territory of the Gaza and the West Bank region which borders the two conflicting states.

Since the time that had passed, many changes had happened in relation to the situation of Israel and Palestine. Different states intervened with the situation and showed interest in the situation.

The United States had joyfully included itself as the major key player in the resolution of the conflict. In June 24, 2002 President George W. Bush delivered his speech and encouraged Israel and Palestine to create peaceful negotiations towards having friendly relations and harmony among each other. In his speech he stated that

“We express our determination to bring an end to the blood shed, suffering and decades of conflict between our peoples; to usher in a new era of peace, based on freedom, security, justice, dignity, respect and mutual recognition: to propagate a culture of peace and non-violence; to confront terrorism and incitement, whether committed by Palestinians or Israelis.

In furtherance of the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace and security, we agree to immediately launch good-faith bilateral negotiations in order to conclude a peace treaty, resolving all outstanding issues, including all core issues, without exception, as specified in previous agreements.” (Bush, np)

President George W. Bush expressed his enthusiasm towards the great possibilities of the positive relations between Israel and Palestine. HE imply for a program called “The Roadmap for Peace in the Middle East” that would provide proper guidance to the states to be able to achieve the goal of peace and harmony.

He has continuously suggested that there be negotiations. There would be a committee that would specifically address the issues of the states involved in the conflict. A joint work plan would be established as well as an overseeing team to monitor the projects.

The “Roadmap for Peace in the Middle East” is a plan formed by the United States shaped to stop the conflict between the Israel and Palestine. The conflict resolution will be led by the “Quartet” which is composed of the United States, Russia, The European Union and the United Nations .The plan was presented at the Israel Palestinian Authority last April 30, 2003.

The US Department of State said, “The plan

We will write a custom essay sample on
A Geographical Analysis of the Roadmap for Peace in the Middle East
or any similar topic only for you
Order Now
is a performance-based, goal-driven plan, with clear phases, timelines, and benchmarks. It involves reciprocal steps by the two parties in the political, security, economic, and humanitarian fields” (Bureau of Public Affairs, np).

The concept of the Road map is mainly obliging the Palestinian Authority to create democratic reforms and neglect the utilization of terrorism. On the other hand, Israel should support and recognize the materialization of a new Palestine Government including the settlement of the Gaza and West Bank conflict.

The assumed out come of the strategy is the broad resolution of the Israel and Palestine conflict however, the dedication and good-faith efforts by both states are necessary for the implementation of the Road map. Other than the members of the Quartet, other regional Arab leaders will exertion effort to maintain and assist the progression.  (Bureau of Public Affairs, np)

We will write a custom essay sample on
A Geographical Analysis of the Roadmap for Peace in the Middle East
or any similar topic only for you
Order Now