The Definition of Me-Orientation, the Importance of Competent Communication, and the Definition of Aggregation

Last Updated: 22 Mar 2023
Pages: 5 Views: 18

Me-orientation is best defined as a person who is solely focused on themselves with no interest in or respect for anyone else. In answer to the question, No I don't believe there are any circumstances where a me-orientation would be necessary in a small group. anything, I think that if even one person in a group had a me-orientation, it would negatively affect the whole group. It would in no way be helpful or productive. There is concrete evidence in chapter 1 of the textbook that supports this answer. On page 28 of the textbook, there is a list of basic ethical standards which are honesty, respect, fairness, choice, and responsibility.

Honesty is greatly valued in American culture and dishonesty is not as is the case for all other ethical systems as well. The next one, respect is especially important and crucial to the functioning of any groups and disrespect is looked down upon in all major religions and moral codes. Fairness is simply treating all people equally regardless of any differences they may have such as sex, ethnicity, or lifestyle.. Choice is, simply put, the freedom to make decisions for ourselves without threat or intimidation. Responsibility is being we-orientated and having concern for more than just your personal and even group goals. This means thinking about not just what should be done to achieve the group goals, but how it's going to be done as well is seen as important.

Therefore, it is more than reasonable to say that a me-orientation would go against every one of the ethical standards especially respect and honesty. A me- orientation would be especially harmful to the functioning and productivity of a group as a whole, including a small one. If I'm drawing on my own life experience, I can think of many instances where a me-orientation has led to tension, conflict, and stress. All of the instances that come to mind have occured within one of the most basic groups, my family. While I can't think of any specific incidents as they have happened over the course of many years, I am quite certain that they happened. This is because there a quite of few members in my family that are self-centered, disrespectful, and primarily focused on themselves.

Order custom essay The Definition of Me-Orientation, the Importance of Competent Communication, and the Definition of Aggregation with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

Competent communication is best defined as a successful method of communicating that doesn't cause any conflict, tension, or hostility. In answer to the question, No, I don't think competent communication ever requires dishonesty. To be dishonest, I believe would simply cause tension and conflict and even more so if the guilty person was ever found out. There is evidence in chapter 1 in the textbook that supports this. Once again, I'm referring to page 28 that has the list of ethical standards. The first one is honesty and I believe that speaks to how important and valued it is, especially in American culture. It states that if everyone in a family was dishonest, no one can be trusted. That can be applied to a group as well. If everyone was dishonest, everything would be thrown into disarray and tension would mount. No good would come from it.

Even if only one person lied in a group, it would still cause difficulty and lead to conflict and tension. So it's something that should be avoided. There is nothing that can justify it. In my experience, it simply complicates things and leads to mistrust. I can think of one specific example from my own life experience. One summer, my sister was in summer camp and she came home early. I asked her why she was coming home early and she told me it was because they ended camp earlier than the usual time and I believed her because I had no reason to doubt her. Anyway, I told one of my parents about what she told me and they called the camp who said that they didn't end camp early. As it turns out, my sister didn't go to camp at all. Basically, she ditched camp in favor of doing something else and she was covering her tracks by lying to me about why she was home. Honestly, I was really shocked at the time, not just that she ditched camp but that she lied to me about it.

Thinking about it now, it makes sense to me that she lied because she knew that if she told me the truth that I would tell one of my parents and she would get in trouble for it. So, she tried to get away with it and it ended up completely backfiring on her because she got caught anyway. I understand it but it's still hurtful even now because that was the first time I realized my sister was capable of lying. This seed of doubt had been planted which led to mistrust. Also, if I'm being totally honest, it was the day I started to see her as a different person and I still feel like that now. I think this really drives my point home. Even though it may be easier to lie, the possible consequences just aren't worth it. In the end, honesty is the right way to go.

An aggregation is best defined as a collection of random people who have no interaction with each other. A small group is best defined as a collection of three or more people working together to achieve a common goal. The main difference between an aggregation and a small group is that in a small group, people are working together to achieve a common goal whereas an aggregation does not interact with each other at all. On page 33 in the textbook, the definitions of aggregation and a group are clearly stated as an aggregation being a collection of people who do not interact with each other at all and a group being three or more people working together to achieve a common goal. There are plenty of examples I can think of from my life experience that prove these definitions to be correct.

One example is when I go to a fast-food restaurant such as Mcdonald's and I'm waiting on line to order my food. The people and I would be an aggregation because we have no interaction or association with each other. We're simply there to order food and nothing else. Another example is when I go to the movie theater and I'm waiting on line to buy a ticket. This would also be an aggregation because, once again, the people and I would not be interacting with each other. We're all there to buy a movie ticket and then see a movie.

Another example is when I'm at school and the teacher splits the class into groups to complete an assignment. This would be an group because we'd have to interact with each other in order to achieve a common goal, in this case, the assignment we were given. The last example is when I'm at home and I'm asked to help cook dinner. That would also be considered a group because I'm interacting with the other members of my household to achieve a common goal, in this case to cook dinner. So, the most important thing to remember is that the main difference between aggregations and groups is that one has no interaction with each other and the other one does in order to achieve a common goal.

Cite this Page

The Definition of Me-Orientation, the Importance of Competent Communication, and the Definition of Aggregation. (2023, Mar 22). Retrieved from

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer