Compare the ways in which Wordsworth presents London in Upon Westminster Bridge with Blakes view of London in his poem London
London, the best place you could ever dream of or the worst nightmare? London in 1700’s was a different city, they didn’t have cars instead of that they had horses, there was less pollution and fewer roads. People used to wear more formal clothes. In this piece of coursework I am going to compare ‘London’ by William Blake and ‘Upon
or any similar topic only for you
or any similar topic only for you
com/in-westminster-abbey-analysis/">Westminster Bridge’ by William Wordsworth. William Wordsworth used to live on countryside, he only seen the positive side of London as William Blake lived in London and saw the realistic world. Blake only has seen the negative side of London.
When you are looking from the bridge you can have a good overview and the bad side about looking from the bridge is that you can’t see the details because you are distances. Wordsworth visit London in the morning and in most of the country’s in the morning everything is quiet because the city is asleep. Wordsworth had a sad life because when he was around 8 years his mother died, and when he was 13 his father died, when he visited London that could be a runaway from problems that he might have and be able to forget about the sad moments.
He also might feel that he is not overruled by somebody else, he could feel free. Both of the poems are about London but both of them got different background. Blake see the negative side when he written ‘Blasts the new-born Infant’s tear’ by this quote we can tell that every one live with a fear. Every child that was born must have a bad life because in those times they mum’s might been a prostitute because if a women needs money she was able to sell herself because she wasn’t able to find a better job. The poor people weren’t able to be educated.
Poor people in their times would be always poor. As Wordsworth seen only the good side of London but he never lived there so how could he rate London when he visits it only once? ‘The beauty of the morning: silent, bare, ships, towers, domes, theatres and temples’ by this quote we can see that he had written the poem in the morning when everybody is about to wake up. He tells the way as he sees it or imagines it, he is not realistic. The word ‘tear’ could also be a tear of happiness as well as of sadness. William Blake was a person that strongly was interest in religions.
In the first stanza he repeats himself twice, once by using “charter’d”. This shows that he is talking about the characters of people; he saw this as robbing ordinary people of their right and freedoms. The second repetition he used was the word “marks”. This has a double meaning one of them could be that the physical damages that are being made and leaving marks in everybody minds and they can’t forget about it. The other meaning could be that he is collecting evidences as he walks around. Blake’s poem is full of negative words that he used in every stanza such as “blood”, “weakness”, “cry” and many more.
The poem ends with words “marriage hearse” for everyone marriage is such a great thing but he compared it to funerals. This might shows that he prefers to be lonely. William Wordsworth used his imagination when he was writing the poem as well as being on the bridge and seeing the realistic world. He written something that cant happens in realistic world, “The beauty of the morning” “like a garment”, the city cannot be wearing clothes, but it’s already clothed itself by nature. Wordsworth used list to describe the things he was seeing. He doesn’t only show positive language in line 1, 9 and 11 he used negative language.
Most of the lines contain positive language words like “bright”, “glittering”, “splendour” and “glideth” create a magical world that is being like it fake and unrealistic. The poem is written as a sonnet which doesn’t just show love but it shows the poets love for London. The average number of syllables in each line is 10. William uses this because it suggests that he doesn’t want anything to change in London. The poem is very peaceful and calm. Evidence for this is ‘never did sun more beautifully steep’. This shows that London was a beautiful place, very calm, and a lot of country side might not have many buildings around.
William Wordsworth writes about what he can see in the morning when he stands on Westminster Bridge. ‘The beauty of the morning’ is evidence for this. It is written in the 3rd person and is also in the present tense. This shows that it was happening as he was writing the poem. This also helps the reader to visualise what is happening and to understand the poem more. The sestet is about how the poet feels. Evidence for this is ‘Ne’er saw I, never felt, calm so deep’. It is in the 1st person and is partially in the past tense, he shows positive language. Blake’s format of the poem is like lyrics of a song.
There are four stanzas, all of them shows different aspect of the city. Every single stanza talks about something else. His poem is like snapshots of loads of different scenes. In my opinion both of the poetess have right to give their own opinion, like every human being. William Blake showed the bad side of London and Wordsworth the good side, both of them has right to show the differences every person got different views for certain things. Blake was showing the negative things to show what makes him angry as Wordsworth has made his poem calm and enjoyable for everyone.