Last Updated 26 Jan 2021

Case against Animal Experiments Based on Ethical Theories

Words 329 (1 page)
Views 167

Many millions of animals suffer and die every year in the name of science. How can this practice be justified? Public debate usually centers on the moral issues.

Proponents of the practice argue that the benefits to humans of live animal research are so great that the practice is justified. Opponents argue that no matter what the benefits, the practice is morally odious. Rarely are the scientific benefits of the practice questioned, and when they are, the critique is underdeveloped.

Order custom essay Case against Animal Experiments Based on Ethical Theories with free plagiarism report

GET ORIGINAL PAPER

Brute Science fills a long neglected gap in the debate by offering an innovative analysis of the scientific benefits of animal research. Although they do discuss basic research, the main thrust of LaFollette and Shanks' argument is directed against applied biomedical research--in particular the use of animals to predict the courses of disease, the efficacy of new treatments, and any harmful side effects that might accompany the latter.

The practice of testing new drugs and procedures on animals prior to clinical trials is compulsory in many countries and arguably accounts for the greatest proportion of the live animals used in research.

The term "animal rights" poses vexing definitional issues, and these issues are complicated by the imprecision with which the term is so often used. Many people loosely associate "animal rights" with the idea that people have a moral, legal, or custodial duty to treat animals humanely. Such a gloss allows the notion of rights for animals to appear mainstream and to elicit support across a broad spectrum.

Peter Singer, who first articulated the ethical basis upon which much of the contemporary animal rights movement rests, prefers to avoid the use of the word "rights" altogether. "The language of rights is a convenient political shorthand" Singer wrote in his seminal book, Animal Liberation (Singer, n.p.).

"It is even more valuable in the era of thirty-second TV news clips than it was in Jeremy Bentham's day; but in the argument for a radical change in our attitude to animals, it is in no way necessary." (Singer, n.p.)

Case against Animal Experiments Based on Ethical Theories essay

This essay was written by a fellow student. You can use it as an example when writing your own essay or use it as a source, but you need cite it.

Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses

Starting from 3 hours delivery 450+ experts on 30 subjects
get essay help 124  experts online

Did you know that we have over 70,000 essays on 3,000 topics in our database?

Cite this page

Explore how the human body functions as one unit in harmony in order to life

Case against Animal Experiments Based on Ethical Theories. (2016, Jun 22). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/case-against-animal-experiments-based-on-ethical-theories/

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer