Workplace Racial Profiling

One of the fundamental rights any individual has is not to be prejudiced against in the workplace. Regrettably, though, reality does not comply at all times with the law; people maintain to be prejudiced against in many ways. The most important reason for all these problems is the discrimination. This inequity at work will not die out by itself.

The eradication of discrimination, particularly racial profiling in the workplace, needs purposeful, focused and unfailing efforts as well as policies by all parties involved over a constant time. In times gone by, a remarkable boost in employment population has been occurring. Ever since the early history people of different culture and race have played a derivative role wherein these individuals were and still are perceived as less than the ideal employee.

Diversity is significant in the workplace; it connotes differences, difference of race, age, religion, sex, and culture etc. People having diverse demographic differences working as one in the organization makes diverse workforce. And it is turning out to be more significant for the organizations to recognize these differences and manage it.  Diversity is the frequent issue in the workforce atmosphere, in a number of companies employees frequently get discriminated due to the diverse features. So it is significant to manage the diversity workforce to value most excellent performance. Most significant aspect nowadays is to train the managers to manage the diverse workforce.

Order custom essay Workplace Racial Profiling with free plagiarism report

450+ experts on 30 subjects Starting from 3 hours delivery

Get Essay Help

Employing associations appoint in workplace racial profiling to manage workplace traditions. Firms rationalize monitoring as well as regulating employee look through claiming that they have to present to their clients a professional-looking personnel or one that attracts customer preferences.

Recognizing the ideal workers as well as preserving a standardized business culture has turned out to be increasingly difficult in the aggressive, culturally-diverse market (Edley 2003, p172). Businesses face challenging demands of inevitability and modernism, which necessitates them to optimize effectiveness of construction and delivery procedures while concurrently expanding new services and products.

Racial profiling is classified to members of ethnic or racial minority groups who are beleaguered as probable suspects for precedent or potential crimes. Those who employ in workplace racial profiling validate their practices with a fixed purpose to defend people from the expenses of deviance; the consequences of being wrongly accused of an offence are more unconcealed and discriminating than the costs of having one's managerial obligation called into difficulty or exhibit choices restrained.

As the companies of these days are getting more diverse, the necessity of workplace racial profiling is mounting. All nations are having more diverse workforce daily. So it is turning out to be significant for the companies manage the diversity to acquire better results out of employees. Organizations should recognize that competing productively in the new global marketplace will require more than the up-to-the-minute technology, most proficient production processes and products.

With the aim of ensuring consistency, solidity, and control whilst executing this multifaceted business strategy, a lot of firms strengthen their efforts to draw and keep persons who obey the rules to the business customs and have the quality of an ideal employee. Simultaneously, firms aspire to augment employee diversity to meet the terms of lawful pressures, business forces, and ethical demands to build up workers from a variety of civilizing backgrounds.

These challenging desires for inevitability (via traditionalism) and modernization (via diversity) generate tensions in several organizations around recognizing the ideal workers. Many managers answered this diversity issue with the claim that discrimination is wrong, both morally and legally. But nowadays, managers are voicing a following concept too. A more diverse workforce will augment organizational efficiency. It will raise self-esteem, bring greater entrée to new-fangled segments of the market, and improve production.

Companies leading the way in diversity management discovered that by means of embracing the elements of cultural and ethnic diversity in their workforce they have improved their capability in understanding and tapping new markets, in and abroad. While the decree forbids prejudice rooted in status identities, courts have repudiated to develop the compass of anti-discrimination decree within the administrative centres to forbid workplace policies that set demands on identity performances.

By failing to give lawful protection based on identity performance, courts present employers unencumbered judgment to build up apparently unbiased workplace policies that place an encumber on minority employees and offer means for prevailing groups to target minorities in violation minority employees' rights.

All want to eradicate the uneven treatment of people in the workplace. One technique that can be used to hold up equal opportunity would be to initiate legislation to guarantee equivalent pay for equivalent work. The problems associated with this resolution would be enormous. How would citizens gauge the value of a person’s labour to another’s? Who would make a decision to this and how would it be put into practice?

People’s attitudes toward their co-workers in the workplace are gradually starting to transform. More opportunities emerge for employees nowadays than ever before. The imbalanced treatment will take years to change in the workplace, but change is actually taking place. This subject will remain until people treat each other equally, based on their skills.

Time and again, regrettably, reality does not constantly act in accordance with the law – as people have perceived, people maintain to discriminate other people against in diverse ways: they have less access to the labour market, they earn fewer than the said ‘ideal workers’ and they constantly bump heads against the “glass ceiling” in promotion pursuit (Litvin 2006, p75).

There are many remedies into the workplace that have tried to deal with workplace racial profiling. Though there are many improvements for profiling in the office, there are several inequalities. Remedies are considered necessary to secure all employees an equal role in the workplace. Gender parity can be attained. This can occur when all change the attitudes of all to each other. When all achieve that then everybody else can achieve gender fairness in the workplace.

References:

Edley, C. (2003). The New American Dilemma: Racial Profiling in the War on our Freedoms:

Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. Richard C. Leone & Greg Anrig Editions. pp170

73

Litvin, D. (2006). Diversity: Making Space for a Better Case.  Handbook of Workplace

Diversity. Alison M. Konrad, Pushkala Prasad & Judith K. P

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

Check my essay Hire Writer