Case Study for Coca-Cola vs Pepsico for 2009
Consider companies from a financial point of view, compare and draw a conclusion. On April 9, 2009, Coca-Cola Company reported cash and cash equivalent to be $6,816,000,000 and on December 26, 2009, PepsiCo reported cash and cash equivalent to be $3,943,000,000.
Coca-Cola has made almost double the cash and cash equivalent than PepsiCo. Cash equivalent from both companies generally including their time deposits and other investments that are highly liquidated and have maturities of three months or less at the date of as cash equivalents from both companies.
Coca-Cola Company typically fund a significant portion of their dividends, capital expenditures, contractual obligations, and share repurchases and acquisitions with cash generated from operating activities. They rely on external funding for additional cash requirements.
Order custom essay Case Study for Coca-Cola vs Pepsico for 2009 with free plagiarism report
450+ experts on 30 subjects
Starting from 3 hours delivery
The Company does not typically raise capital through the issuance of stock. Instead, the company use debt financing to lower overall cost of capital and increase their return on shareowners’ equity. Refer to the heading ‘‘Cash Flows from Financing Activities”.
PepsiCo believed that their cash generating capability and financial condition, together with their revolving credit facilities and other available methods of debt financing, would be adequate to meet their operating, investing and financing needs. As of December 26, 2009, their operations in Venezuela comprised 7% of their cash and cash equivalents balance.
Cite this Page
Case Study for Coca-Cola vs Pepsico for 2009. (2018, Jan 07). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/case-study-for-coca-cola-vs-pepsico-for-2009/
Run a free check or have your essay done for you
