Last Updated 06 Oct 2022

The Proverbs of Administration Herbert Simon Summary

Category Administration
Essay type Summary
Words 578 (3 pages)
Views 1837
Table of contents

Bekki Drewlo Simon, Herbert A. (1946). The Proverbs of Administration. In J. M. Shafrits & A. C. Hyde (Eds. ), Classics of public administration (6th ed. ) (pp. 124-137). Boston, MA: Thompson Wadsworth.

Article summary

In Herbert Simon’s “The Proverbs of Administration” he begins outlining what he describes as the “accepted administrative principles” (p. 124). These principles state that administrative efficiency is increased by specialization of tasks among members of a group, unity of command, limiting the p of control at any one point in the hierarchy and by grouping the workers according to purpose, process, clientele and place.

Order custom essay The Proverbs of Administration Herbert Simon Summary with free plagiarism report


He then goes on to detail specific examples of how each principle could be tested in real world administrative situations for validity. Simon subjects each principle in turn to a very critical analysis beginning with specialization. He describes specialization as a “deceptive simplicity” and conveys that the fundamental problem with specialization is that it is ambiguous and he leads the reader to determine that the principle of specialization is “of not help at all” in deciding how to specialize to improve efficiency (p. 25) Turning to unity of command, Simon points out that this principle is simply “incompatible with the principle of specialization” (p. 125). If using the specialization principal, then the specialist would be looked upon for the decisions, not the person in command as the unity of command principal would require. Span of control contradictions are highlighted by Simon by describing how both an increase and a decrease in the p of control could increase or decrease efficiency in an organization. Lastly, Simon evaluates organization by purpose, process, clientele and place.

In this principle, organization based on one aspect would be to the detriment of the remaining three. In each evaluation Simon provides either contradictory solutions that meet the requirement of the proverb in question or describes situations where adherence to the proverb could be inefficient if not irresponsible. Simon suggests rather that the “principles of administration” are merely “criteria for describing and diagnosing administrative situations”(p. 131). Finally, Simon relates that the proverbs of administration are in desperate need of empirical research and ultimately revision.

He states that efficiency should be a definition of what is “good” or “correct” administrative behavior rather than a principle of administration (p. 133). He goes on to describe an approach for a more scientific analysis of administrative principles that would allow one to easily choose between equally viable yet opposing solutions to a single administrative problem. He provides the road map by which he believes this could be accomplished, yet admits that it may even be a “quixotic” undertaking (p. 136).

The irony of this final contradiction is not lost on this reader.

Key Points:

  • The accepted administrative principles or proverbs are inherently flawed.
  • These principles are still of value by using them as “criteria for describing and diagnosing administrative situations”(pg 131).
  • Specialization
  • Unity of Command
  • Span of Control
  • Organization by purpose, Process, Clientele, Place
  • The accepted administrative principles or proverbs are in desperate need of empirical research and ultimately revision.


This article is relevant to students and practitioners of administration because it highlights the ongoing struggle with administrative theory. Simon highlights the contradictions inherent with the “accepted administrative principles” but leads the reader to understand that these principles are useful as tools in the practice of administration (p. 124). After evaluation of specialization, unity of command, p of control and organization by purpose, process, clientele and place, administrators can rely on experience to determine the appropriate behavior.

The Proverbs of Administration Herbert Simon Summary essay

Related Questions

on The Proverbs of Administration Herbert Simon Summary

Who Is The Author Of The Book Proverbs Of Administration?
The author of Proverbs of Administration is unknown. The text was likely written by a bureaucrat during the early Han dynasty (206 BCE – 220 CE). The work is a collection of maxims and advice on how to be a good administrator. The text is divided into two sections: one on general principles of administration, and the other on specific duties of officials.
Who Described The Principles Of Public Administration As Mere Proverbs?
The principles of public administration are often described as mere proverbs by those who are critical of the field. This is because many of the principles are general in nature and do not provide specific guidance on how to address specific problems. However, proponents of public administration argue that the principles provide a framework for thinking about and addressing public administration issues.

This essay was written by a fellow student. You can use it as an example when writing your own essay or use it as a source, but you need cite it.

Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses

Starting from 3 hours delivery 450+ experts on 30 subjects
get essay help 124  experts online

Did you know that we have over 70,000 essays on 3,000 topics in our database?

Cite this page

Explore how the human body functions as one unit in harmony in order to life

The Proverbs of Administration Herbert Simon Summary. (2017, Apr 30). Retrieved from

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer