Research Due To The Status of Prisoners

Last Updated: 13 Feb 2023
Pages: 3 Views: 277

The Holmesburg Prison is a county jail in Philadelphia that is commonly known for its research and experiments on human subjects between the 1950’s and 1970’s. Albert Kligman was the lead researcher who performed violating experiments that not only mistreated the prisoners, but also violated the Nuremberg Code and many of the prisoners were serving time for much smaller offenses like misdemeanors. This paper will argue that when conducting biomedical research, we should treat everyone the same regardless of their history or social position, and maybe prisoners owe public service. “Inmates, while an appealing population to study because of their accessibility and controlled living environment, deserve additional protections under many ethical guidelines and regulatory statutes.

Their ability to give fully voluntary consent is impeded, some believe, by their limited autonomy and the potential for coercion and undue inducement.” When biomedical research is conducted, it is imperative for everyone to be treated equally no matter what th circumstances. This provides consistency among research and results. It was also seen as though since these were inmates, it was their duty to perform this research due to their status as being incarcerated. The inmates also received compensation for their participation in the research, which was most of their income at the time. Unequal treatment of people is morally wrong, since it damages the formal principle of justice, which holds that cases that are equivalent in important regards should be dealt with similarly. So, two individuals convicted of similar wrongdoing with equivalent elements need to get a similar discipline. Consistency is vital for two reasons.

In the first place, being predictable is a piece of being rational. Inconsistent treatment of cases violates the simple thought of an equitable society. Second, inconsistency can disintegrate open help for any arrangement of justice, since individuals may firmly question choices that they see as inconsistent. People may express their dismay with inconsistent choices by resisting the standards or undermining and controlling the framework. In spite of the fact that few individuals question the possibility that equal cases need to be dealt with similarly, a debate can emerge concerning this issue of whether cases are the equivalent or diverse in pertinent regards. For instance, issues relating to racial inequality center around the topic of whether race should ever be a pertinent factor in basic leadership.

Order custom essay Research Due To The Status of Prisoners with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

Advocates of governmental policy regarding minorities in society in college acceptance contend that race can be a significant factor in basic leadership since a school may look for racial variation in its school so there is more diversity when it comes to ideas and lifestyles. Equal treatment of human subjects is fundamental for the ethical leadership of research for a similar reason that it is vital in different everyday issues which is to advance consistency. The creators of the Belmont Report, a powerful record concerning research morals, portray three principles for research with human subjects: regard for people, value, and justice.

They perceived that justice necessitates that subjects be dealt with similarly, however they likewise comprehended that this formal principle should be enhanced by material principles that can recognize cases. One of those principles, which is portrayed in the Belmont Report and classified in federal research rules, is that the determination of research subjects needs to be reasonable or impartial. This principle suggests that specific classes of subjects can't be incorporated into or rejected from research without a real scientific or ethical avocation.

The creators of the Belmont Report were also worried that specific people like prisoners and impoverished people had been selected in studies in view of their accessibility or manipulability and not on the grounds that the exploration was applicable to their condition or disorder. So it is imperative that these and other defenseless subjects need to be incorporated into research solely under specific conditions. One of the largest ethical concerns in research is the unequal treatment of participants. This will be an argument among society for years to come. However, the principle of justice requires any and all to be treated equal. The distribution of fairness and equality is a necessity for proper and successful research regardless of underlying factors.

Cite this Page

Research Due To The Status of Prisoners. (2023, Feb 13). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/research-due-to-the-status-of-prisoners/

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer