Never Let Me Go: Science and the Cultural Imaginary

Category: Never Let Me Go
Last Updated: 12 Aug 2020
Pages: 5 Views: 401

Topic – Explore how the narrative of the novel offers support for and /or critique of science in contemporary context.

‘Never Let Me Go’ is novel by the author Kazuo Ishiguro, from its topic to its characters, and reveals its message and moral through indirect references to the real events and the possible threat posed by science and its discoveries. Even though some elements may not be as concealed as others throughout the story, it remains an entirely radical offense on the discoveries of the science and the effect this then has on the working class.

The most apparent way in which ‘Never Let Me Go’ has a basic Marxist meaning is through the purpose that Hailsham raise clones so that they can donate their organs when they reach their adulthood to the rich when they are in need. The fact that this donation is only for the higher in the society is reminding one of how the intelligensia exploit the proletariat by compelling manual labor while the credit for the work of the poor is rewarded to the rich. When the rich need transplants, Rich can rely on the Hailsham students, and other clones like them, if they need transplants and also with no argument.

Order custom essay Never Let Me Go: Science and the Cultural Imaginary with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

Had the discovery of genetically raised pupils for the sake of transplants never occurred, the higher society would not have this monopoly over the ‘working class’ and the discrimination of opportunity we see here would not have occurred. The rich would stay rich and there would not be clones with low expectancy ratio because their only responsibility is to provide a new set of organs for the needed masses.

The part of this that makes it even more alike to Marxist ideologies is that the learners, while they are aware of their futures, believe that it is normal to be resigned to, just as the proletariat had adopted that their lives of labor, low earnings and never be appreciated for the service they provide is a normal thing to experience. This also highlights a gap in their reification – they aren’t fully satisfied with the condition they are in and this is clear as we go familiar with the novel. for instance, Ruth expresses an interest in working in an office and to have an entirely normal life where she goes to work daily if this is real she would be happy to live her simple life of student, carer, donor.

The life they led at Hailsham is described as “a cosy state of suspension in which we could ponder our lives without the usual boundaries,” which tells us that there is a sense while they thought of the future since the home of their childhood is a safe place where they can imagine an unrealistic future. Other than this, they are entirely unconcerned about their future and it is because of the inventions of science of clones and cloning people for this purpose that they live this life.

The title itself, ‘Never Let Me Go’ is an example of subtle dramatic irony; the pronoun ‘me’ is almost mocking all the characters we meet, as there is no such thing as ‘me’ for Kathy, Tommy and Ruth; their identities are irrelevant because they are bred for a purpose and their physical appearances are that of another human instead of something independent to themselves. For this reason, lowering characters to something that isn’t even an identification attacks the reality that technology has led them to this area in which they stay then die without ever experiencing a unique lifestyle as the whole lot they're is copied or for the benefit of the wealthy. ultimately, is the idea of the Exchanges and the Gallery, which is fundamentally Marxist.

The children at Hailsham are encouraged to create artwork and their instructions recognition on creation in place of whatever of real schooling due to the fact there's no need for them to be educated as they'll never honestly locate any use for Maths or English, and unique portions are then decided on for the ‘gallery’ by means of Madame. The kids additionally provide and get hold of artwork from their buddies and other students.

The idea of gifting away something of cost as a shape of forex is inherently Capitalist; the artwork is a shape of worth and a product of their ‘manual labor’, in a manner, and in giving it away they may be doing simply what the Proletariat do – the usage of their expertise for the gain of the rich. at some point of the unconventional the youngsters are instructed they're particular and unique, and grow up believing that they're cared about and loved for their worth when in fact, they may be the genuine contrary. they may be clones of “trash. Junkies, prostitutes, winos, tramps,”. The only real worth they've is the service they offer for the wealthy. pass over Lucy tells the students, “You’re… special.

That’s what every of you have been created to do,” which concurrently supports what the children are made to feel on the school – that every of them and the artwork they create is special and man or woman and full of capability – whilst also reminding them that they're absolutely owned by way of some other and could by no means live something resembling as special lifestyles. The truth that they're surely familiar with the “lives which have been set out” for them is a covert attack on the technological know-how at the back of their life.

The truth that, due to the bourgeoisie and the people buying clones to be made, raised after which forced to donate their organs, reminds the reader that even though the horrors of the radical are slowly revealed to us in a manner which means we are not bowled over at miss Lucy’s harsh revelation of their futures, this is exactly how it is discovered to them. They're not bowled over as they grow up due to the fact they were conditioned to consider this is the norm because of scientific discoveries that push them to the lowest of society earlier than they may be even born. Ishiguro manages to normalize this concept of cloning however the reader continues to be taken aback at the way the characters embody their fates, yet in our society, IVF is a normalized remedy that nobody contends.

IVF is likewise something that echoes Marxist reviews, because it is something handiest the wealthy can find the money for – at almost £3000 for one spherical of remedy, it could be argued that even something as herbal as having a baby is a luxurious that sure human beings do now not deserve, and in a way, Ishiguro is drawing out attention to how cloning for the sake of organs is something that won't be substantially a ways faraway from current day society while Ishiguro’s ‘never let me go’ is overtly Marxist in its extraordinarily approach, it is conjointly a covert fight in opposition to however medical discoveries aren't continuously beneficial to the lots and instead often is a cruel mechanism with the aid of that the folks at the decrease rungs of society are can be exploited.

While not the discovery of organic studies for the sake of organs, the horrors Kathy, Tommy and Ruth face for the duration of the radical could are companion degree unthinkably cruel fate and therefore Ishiguro is going a manner closer to assaultive this ideology.

Cite this Page

Never Let Me Go: Science and the Cultural Imaginary. (2020, Aug 12). Retrieved from

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer