Last Updated 26 Jan 2021

Nature vs Nurture Analysis

Essay type Analysis
Words 574 (2 pages)
Views 287

Running Head : NATURE VERSUS NURTURE ? Nature versus Nurture (Name (University (Professor (Course /Subject )? Nature versus Nurture ? Before psychology and sociology have dealt on the behaviour of man , the ? dominant view concerning human behaviour was centered on the theory ? proposed by Charles Darwin . He explains that , human nature and human ? behaviour are all natural . By this , Darwin proposed that humans acted ? out of natural tendencies or instincts which are dictated by nature ? through ``genetic make up ' as later discovered by Gregor Mendel .?

However , this kind of thinking was later on rejected through the ? knowledge of the role of ``nurture ' which is a shaping a persons ? behaviour or attitudes and perspectives through cultural context . This ? idea was first instituted by John Watson in his ``behaviourism .? Later on , social scientist began to claim the importance of learned ? social behaviour . On the part of Freud , he developed the theory of ? psychoanalysis which relates biological factors with personality and ? behaviour . He claimed that humans have basic needs that are prompted by ? rives and urges , however , humans are also influenced by society . A ? three dimensional personality results from this , that which is consist ? of the id-which is basically biological needs and satisfaction , the ? conscious ego-the pleasure dimension and the superego-the cultural ? influence to the individual , which includes , morality .

Piaget on the ? other hand develops a cognitive theory , in which he created stages of ? how persons know things . The first is through sensorimotor stage which ? consist of sensory perception , followed by the pre-operational , wherein ? anguage are learned through cultural contact , thirdly , the concrete ? operational wherein the person already learned to use logic and ? relationships and finally the formal operational , characterized by the ? ability to think hypothetically . Kohlberg have outlined his ideas with ? Piaget , however , he is more concerned with moral development . According ? to him , the first stage is comprised of pain and pleasure which is ? termed as preconventional stage it would then be followed by ? conventional stage in which there is already recognition of right and ? rong .

Haven’t found the relevant content? Hire a subject expert to help you with Nature vs Nurture Analysis

$35.80 for a 2-page paper

Hire verified expert

The final stage is the post conventional stage in which there is ? a possibility to critique or find fault within the normal cultural ? thinking . Carol Gilligan , work with and improved Kohlberg ideas by ? incorporating gender with moral development . According to her , males and ? females creates moral judgments using different perspective males uses ? justice perspective which is deeply connected to societal rules and ? bias , while women uses ``care and responsibility ' perspective which is ? ttached to personal damage and harm . Mead recognizes the impact of ? societal bias to the perspective of the ``self ' of each individual ,? promoting the concept of a ``looking glass ' in which the person is ? conscious about how others perceived the person . The concept of a ? subjective self and an objective ``me ' suggest that a person sees ? himself as both independent and dependent to the society in which he ? belong . Lastly , Erikson believes that personality develops throughout a ? persons ' lifetime .

Haven’t found the relevant content? Hire a subject expert to help you with Nature vs Nurture Analysis

$35.80 for a 2-page paper

Hire verified expert

Cite this page

Nature vs Nurture Analysis. (2018, Sep 01). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/nature-vs-nurture-6/

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire verified expert