How Entrepreneurship in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry can be a Cause of Ethical Concerns?
“At a more fundamental level, it can be argued that the very nature of what some might refer to as acting in an entrepreneurial way raises ethical questions”. (Morris et al. , 2002 p 31).
In many academic studies, the hospitality and tourism sector has been associated with a low degree of entrepreneurial behavior.
Order custom essay How Entrepreneurship in the Hospitality? with free plagiarism report
Mentions can be made of the likes of the internationally endorsed Conrad Hilton and Thomas Cook, with the more recent innovators such as Richard Branson and Stelios Haji-Ioannou, all of whom have deeply transformed their respective sectors. However, the international tourism industry seems to be lacking entrepreneurial impulse in contrast to other sectors (Page et al. , 1999; Andriotis, 2002; Morrison & Teixeira, 2003). This short paper aims to explain the ethical issues associated with entrepreneurship and how it could concern the tourism and hospitality industry.
By cross-referencing the theories of ethics and entrepreneurship, the ethical and value dilemmas that underlie this issue will also be discussed and analyzed on the macro and microenvironment. This assignment will rely on case studies which will support managers in different aspects such as the identification of the stakeholders involved and its implications, and the provision of potential measures focussing on the implementation of professional judgments as part of strategic planning with the goal of redressing this issue.
Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations on Entrepreneurship Ethics
Ethics focuses on the self-awareness between what one represents right and wrong. It emphasizes the grounds and nature of morality, incorporating rules of conduct, moral judgments, and standards (Taylor, 1975). Hunt and Vitell’s model (1993) highlights three important ethical theories and explains how personal moral codes are being influenced by deontological, theological, or environmental practices.
Other major macro-environmental ethical theories include stockholder, stakeholder, and social contract theories (extended to Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) by Donaldson and Dunfee in1994). The Entrepreneurial Context of Ethics According to Morrison (2000a), Greenbank (2001), and Pittaway (2005), entrepreneurship is assimilated with a multi-dimensional attitude that coordinates economic and non-economic behaviors such as ideology, legitimacy, social mobility, and psychological factors (McKay, 2001). Vyakarnam et al. 1997) demonstrate that small business entrepreneurship ethics could be classified under three themes; the impact of the owner’s personality on business ethics, which is leading to the conflicts of personal values, and entrepreneurial activity itself. On a macro-economic level, it has been demonstrated that entrepreneurship is linked to distinctive challenges; emerging from industry settings. New enterprises are often subject to limited financial resources, recurrent over-dependence on a restricted offer, their propensity to depend on a niche consumer base, and constant environmental changes.
A moderately restricted market presence, inhering small enterprises to significant demand instability, enhanced by the lack of support from distributors and suppliers, an aggressive competitor’s penetration may also impact start-ups negatively (Boyd and Gumpert, 1983).
Stages of Entrepreneurship development
According to the extensive literature review, entrepreneurial development stages (Figure 1) have a profound impact on ethics as the company develops and grows from venture ideas to a mature organization (Dodge, 1992). While small business entrepreneurs differed significantly from their big business counterparts, Longenecker et al. (1989) could not demonstrate one as being “more” or “less” ethically strict. Therefore, it seems that the ethical evolution of companies is inherent to a number of countering forces which depends on many factors, starting from the development stage of the company. While, limited management controls, pragmatic operational demands, and lack of public visibility associated in the creation stages may adversely impact ethical consideration, the entrepreneur’s personal beliefs and pride may encourage a higher ethical focus. Figure 1: Evolution in the ethical reference point as ventures grow (Morris et al. 2002)
How the Organisational Context affects Entrepreneurship?
Other ethics challenges may arise from the organizational structure, relating to the stakeholder theory discussed previously. Especially, the initial stages of venture formation the founding entrepreneur are intrinsically linked to the new structure, while important stakeholders involved have often personal and social relationships with the founder. Family, friends, or even employees may also be investors which will raise unique and complex ethical problems (Dees and Starr, 1992).
These social ties may also engender collusion and misconduct which may lead to conflicts and increased unethical behavior. The Social and Economical Role of Entrepreneurship Arguably, the social and moral role of entrepreneurship in economic terms varies. While entrepreneurship views empirically as a key economic development factor; there is a divergence about the intrinsic relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development. In an environment that can be particularly challenging to entrepreneurs, institutions play an important role in fostering or discouraging entrepreneurship.
Mair and Marti (2011) show that in situations where voids can be observed in functioning institutions, new ventures also play a building role by creating new networks of stakeholders, which ultimately will create emerging markets (Sarasvathy and Dew, 2005). Nevertheless, the absence of solid institutions in an environment dominated by well-established entrepreneurial networks can actually hinder the emulation of new ventures by creating financial barriers to entry, and by diluting supplementary entrepreneurial activity (Aidis et al. , 2008).
The concept of Empowerment and Social Entrepreneurship
It is important to note that entrepreneurship’s role has traditionally been to empower alternative trails to achievement and/or an opt-out option to modern living (Scase, 2000). This concept introduces the concerns with pursuing lifestyle preferences where individuals align entrepreneurial activity (also called lifestyle entrepreneurship) to fit personal goals and lifestyles (Kaplan 2003, Botlon and Thompson 2003). It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that this role could relate to social entrepreneurship (Bridge et al. , 2003).
With a stronger focus on social development than the concept of entrepreneurship, Bystydzienski (1992) suggests that empowerment allows an individual to gain the ability to hold power to the extent of self-governing and shaping daily life. By doing so, the initiator becomes more involved in a process of social, economic, psychological, and political change which represents the four underpinning theories of Scheyven’s (1999) model of empowerment. In the case of women-owned small businesses, Heyser (2006) observes that the role of women empowerment could be used as potential catalysts for more profound societal changes.
Al-Dajani (2007, p. 20) defined women’s empowerment as “a continuous, on-going process entailing enhanced abilities to control choices, decisions, and actions”. This definition reiterates that women's empowerment could be seen as a central condition to positive change and progress within a wider community. In a more recent article, Al-Dajani & Carter (2010), advocate that the influence and respect of empowered women within the household, community, and society at large is increased.
In this sense, one could assume that the need for social change could be initiated at local levels by the empowerment of women through entrepreneurial activities, especially in countries where the suppression of women’s involvement is largely accepted and observed.
The Factors emerging from Entrepreneurship
From the preceding discussion emerges the notion of an individual’s assessment of social acceptability, appeal, and viability influenced by cultural attitudes and norms, socio-economic factors, and the relation between the entrepreneur and their host community (Jones, 2000).
It is then debatable that entrepreneurs could be either seen as reactive or proactive individuals in this process. Entrepreneurs are not necessarily driven by tangible assets, such as maximization of a return on investment, or the exploitation of marketing opportunities.
The role of Industry Settings in Entrepreneurship
Due to low legal and professional barriers to entry, the industry setting could be seen as the prospective ground for entrepreneurs to apply their innovative process (Morrison, 1998b; Szivas, 2001). Moreover, local research by Nyaupane et al. 2006) found that tourism growth in the Annapurna region, an area dependant on climbing and trekking tourism, has enhanced the quality of life for the local population and has helped the revival of regional traditional culture. This was echoed by another more recent study from Walker et al. (2011), which highlights that the involvement in the production of hospitality services is particularly suitable for women in developing regions due to their limited literacy and low levels of education.
Conclusion
The overall findings from the case study (McMillian et al. 2011) highlight that women’s empowerment in the hospitality and tourism industry has improved their self-sufficiency and quality of life by reducing their workloads. At a more local level, access to wider occupational opportunities and schooling alternatives has initiated the chance for children and younger siblings to make their own life decisions. However, the gain of respect that women have secured is fundamentally linked with the increase of revenue generated through their businesses. This condition shows how crucial economic empowerment is in the overall process.
Also, the political empowerment of women is still problematic, especially in a larger cultural context. Although developmental efforts were initiated by national governments, gender equality progress has yet to penetrate communities at a local level. Small family businesses facilitate the wealth creation process to rural and peripheral communities and local economies, by positively contributing to social and financial capital gain. In doing so, the sustenance of natural environments, crafts, and traditions which might otherwise disappear are often regenerated.
References:
Al-Dajani, H. 2007, Women’s Empowerment: A Comparison Between Non-profit and For-profit Approaches in Empowering Home-based Women Producers, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Al-Dajani, H. and Carter, S. (2010),
“The empowerment of self-employed home-based women producers: evidence from Jordan”, in Brush, C. , Gatewood, E. , de Bruin, A. and Henry, C. (Eds), Women Entrepreneurs, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Andrews, R. , Baum, T. and Andrew, M. A. (2001),
“The lifestyle economics of small tourism businesses”, Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, Vol. 1, pp. 16-25. Anand, A. and Josse, O. 2002,
“Celebrating mountain women: moving mountains, moving women”, Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 233-5. Andriotis, K. (2002),
“Scale of hospitality firms and local economic development – evidence from Crete”, Tourism Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 333-42. Basu, A. (2004),
“Entrepreneurial aspirations among family business owners: an analysis of ethnic business owners in the UK”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 10, pp. 12-33. Beaver, G. (2002),
Small business, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, Financial Times/Prentice Hall, London. Bennett, L. Tamang, S. , Onta, P. and Thapa, M. (2006),
Unequal Citizens: Gender, Caste and Ethnic Exclusion in Nepal, Department for International Development, The World Bank, Kathmandu. Bolton, B. and Thompson, J. (2003),
The Entrepreneurs in Focus: Achieve Your Potential, Thomson Learning, London. Bridge, S. , O’Neill, K. and Cromie, S. (2003),
Understanding Enterprise, Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Brockhaus, R. (1994),
“Family business: a blessing or a curse? ” Keynote Address, Proceedings of the Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Auckland, NZ, 25-27 September.
Burns, P. (2001), Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Bystydzienski, J. (1992),
Women Transforming Politics: Worldwide Strategies for Empowerment, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. Cameron, A. and Massey, C. (1999),
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A New Zealand Perspective, Addison Wesley Longman New Zealand, Auckland. Carland, J. W. , Hoy, F. , Boulton, W. and Carland, J. A. (1984),
“Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualisation”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 No. , pp. 354-9. Carter, S. and Shaw, E. (2006),
Women’s Business Ownership: Recent Research and Policy Developments, DTI Small Business Service Research Report, London. Cattarinich, X. (2001),
“Pro-poor tourism initiatives in developing countries: analysis of secondary case studies”, Pro-Poor Tourism Working Paper No. 8, available at: www. propoortourism. org. uk Chetterjea, R. and Basu, A. (1978),
“The relationship between social distance and levels of conceptual integration”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 104, pp. 299-300. Connolly, P. and McGing, G. 2007),
“High performance work practices and competitive advantage in the Irish hospitality sector”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 201-10. Craig, J. and Lindsay, N. (2002),
“Toward a theory of incorporating the family dynamic into the entrepreneurship process: a case of corporate governance”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 416-30. Cromie, S. , Adams, J. , Dunn, B. and Reid, R. (1999),
“Family firms in Scotland and Northern Ireland: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. No. 3, pp. 253-66. Ford, R. C. and Heaton, C. P. (2001),
“Lessons from hospitality that can serve anyone”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 30-47. Getz, D. and Carlsen, J. (2000),
“Characteristics and goals of family and owner-operated businesses in the rural tourism and hospitality sectors”, Tourism Management, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 547-60. Harris J. et al. (2010),
Ethics and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Ethics and Entrepreneurship, vol 1, pp7-26 Heyzer, N. (2006),
Poverty and Women’s Work in the Informal Economy, World Bank, Washington, DC. Hofstede, G. 1984,
Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Sage, London. Irvine, W. and Anderson, A. (2004),
“Small tourist firms in rural areas: agility, vulnerability and survival in the face of crisis”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 229-46. Jones, K. (2000), “Psychodynamics, gender, and reactionary entrepreneurship in metropolitan Sao Paulo, Brazil”, Women in Management Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 207-17. Kaplan, J. (2003),
Patterns of Entrepreneurship, John Wiley & Sons, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Kets de Vries, M. 1996), Family Business: Human Dilemmas in the Family Firm, Thomson International Business Press, London. Kirzner, I. (1979), Perception, Opportunity and Profit Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, London University Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Klidas, A. , Van Den Berg, P. T. and Wilderom, C. P. M. (2007),
“Managing employee empowerment in luxury hotels in Europe”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 70-88. Garrison, T. (1996),
International Business Culture, Elm Publications, Huntingdon. Giddens (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration.
University of California Press. Los Angeles, CA Goffee, R. (1996), “Understanding family businesses: issues for further research”, International Journal of entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 36-48. Greenbank, P. (2001), “Objective setting in the micro-business”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 108-27. Habbershon, T. and Williams, M. (1999),
A Resource Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms, Working Paper Series 101, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Kollmair, M. , Manandhar, S. , Subedi, B. and Thieme, S. (2006), “New figures for old stories: migration and remittances in Nepal”, Migration Letters, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 151-60. Lashley, C. (1995), “Towards an understanding of employee empowerment in hospitality services”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 27-32. Lockyer, C. and Morrison, A. (1999), Scottish Tourism Market: Structure, Characteristics and Performance, Scottish Tourism Research Unit/Fraser of Allander Institute, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Lynch, P. 1999), “Host attitudes towards guests in the homestay sector”, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 119-44. McAdam, R. , McConvery, T. and Armstrong, G. (2004),
“Barriers to innovation within small firms in a peripheral location”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 206-21. McClelland, D. (1961), The Achieving Society, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ. McMillan C et al. , (2011),"Commercial hospitality: A vehicle for the sustainable empowerment of Nepali women", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 23 Iss: 2 pp. 189 – 208
McKay, R. (2001), “Women entrepreneurs: moving beyond family and flexibility”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 148-65. Morgenstern O (1951) ASTIA Document Number ATI 210734 (unpublished manuscript) Middleton, V. and Clarke, J. (Eds. ) (2001), Marketing in Travel and Tourism, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. Morrison, A. (1998b), “Small firm statistics: a hotel sector focus”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 132-42. Morrison, A. (2000a), “Entrepreneurship: what triggers it? ”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. No. 2, pp. 59-71. Morrison A. , (2006),
“A contextualisation of Entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial behaviour & Research, Vol. 12 Iss: 4 pp. 192-209 Morrison, A. and Teixeira, R. (2002), “Small hospitality firms: business performance obstacles”, paper presented at the International Small Hospitality and Tourism Firm Conference, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds. Morrison, A. and Teixeira, R. (2003), “Small firm performance in the context of agent and structure: a cross cultural comparison in the tourism accommodation sector”, in Thomas, R. Ed. ), Small Firms in Tourism: International Perspectives, Elsevier, Oxford. Nyaupane, G. , Morais, D. and Dowler, L. (2006),
“The role of community involvement and number/type of visitors on tourism impacts: a controlled comparison of Annapurna, Nepal and Northwest Yunnan, China”, Tourism Management, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 1373-85. Omar, A. and Davidson, M. (2001), “Women in management: a comparative cross-cultural overview”, Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 8, pp. 35-67. Page, S. , Forer, P. and Lawton, G. (1999), “Small business development and tourism: terra incognita? , Tourism Management, Vol. 20, pp. 435-59. Pittaway, L. (2005),
“Philosophies in entrepreneurship: a focus on economic theories”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 201-21. Phillips, K. W. , Rothbard, N. P. and Dumas, T. L. (2009), “To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 710-32. Ridgeway, C. L. , Li, Y. E. , Erickson, K. G. , Backor, K. and Tinkler, J. E. (2009), “How easily does a social difference become a status distinction?
Gender matters”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 44-62. Scase, R. (2000), “The enterprise culture: the socio-economic context of small firms”, in Carter, S. and Jones-Evans, D. (Eds), Enterprise and Small Business, Financial Times/Prentice Hall, London, pp. 32-47. Scase, R. and Goffee, R. (1989), The Real World of the Small Business Owner, Routledge, London. Scottish Executive (2001), A Smart, Successful Scotland: Ambitions for the Enterprise Network, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh. Scheyvens, R. (1999),
“Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities”, Tourism Management, Vol. 0 No. 2, pp. 245-9. Selznick P. , (1948), “Foundations of the theory of organizations”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 13 pp25–35 Sherwood, A-M. , Parrott, N. , Jenkins, T. , Gillmor, D. , Gaffey, S. and Cawley, M. (2000),
“Craft producers on the Celtic fringe: marginal lifestyles in marginal regions? ”, paper presented at the 15th International Society for the Study of Marginal Regions Seminar, Newfoundland. Szivas, E. (2001), “Entrance into tourism entrepreneurship: a UK case study”, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 163-72. Thomas, R. , Lashley, C. Rowson, B. , Xie, G. , Jameson, S. , Eaglen, A. , Lincoln, G. and Parsons, D. (2001),
The National Survey of Small Tourism and Hospitality Firms: 2001, Centre for the Study of Small Tourism and Hospitality Firms, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds. Walker, S. , Valaoras, G. , Gurung, D. and Godde, P. (2001), “Women and mountain tourism: redefining the boundaries of policy and practice”, in Apostolopoulos, Y. , So? nmez, S. and Timothy, D. J. (Eds), Women as Producers and Consumers of Tourism in Developing Regions, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT, pp. 211-34.
Cite this Page
How Entrepreneurship in the Hospitality?. (2016, Nov 25). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/how-entrepreneurship-in-the-hospitality-and-tourism-industry-can-be-a-cause-of-ethical-concerns/
Run a free check or have your essay done for you