Capture and storage of co2

What Needs To Be Done?

Introduction

Increasing concentrations of C dioxide ( CO2 ) and other gases in the Earth ‘s ambiance are worsening the natural nursery gas consequence and taking to unwanted clime alteration, with attendant hazards of extreme eather, lifting sea degree and inauspicious effects on agribusiness and biodiversity.

The chief beginning of CO2 emanations is the burning of coal, oil and gas in power Stationss, for transit and in places, offices and industry.

Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 have risen by about one-third since preindustrial times and are expected about to duplicate between now and 2100. Under the Kyoto Protocol of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ( UNFCCC ) , developed states have agreed to cut down their emanations by 5.2 % below 1990 degrees by 2008-2012. If they wish to brace CO2 concentrations at twice pre-industrial degrees by the terminal of this century, the developed states will hold to cut down their emanations to around half of their 1990 degrees, or even lower. Such deep cuts would necessitate a combination of greatly reduced energy ingestion, monolithic shift from high-carbon fuels ( coal to natural gas ) , widespread usage of renewable or atomic energy, and sweetening of natural “sinks” for CO2, such as new forest growing.

However, elaborate surveies of well-proven engineerings indicate that capturing and for good hive awaying CO2 emanations from fossil fuel-fired power workss could be a low-priced option for accomplishing big decreases in CO2 emanations.

Successful application of these engineerings would let states to prosecute a scheme providing:

  • really big and comparatively rapid decrease in CO2 emanations ;

  • continued usage of fossil fuels or a less rapid alteration to non-fossil energy beginnings.

Capturing Emissions Of Co2

Co2 Capture In Power Generation

Capture and storage engineerings are best suited to large-scale beginnings of CO2 such as power Stationss, which account for about tierce of planetary CO2 emanations. The two chief engineerings for power coevals are natural gas combined rhythms ( NGCC ) , and pulverised coal-burning ( PF ) steam rhythms. Other big fossil power works constellations, such as incorporate coal gasification combined rhythms ( IGCC ) , are besides suited for CO2 gaining control.

Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Concentrations of CO2 in power station flue-gases range from around 4 % by volume for NGCC workss to 9 % for IGCC workss and 14 % for PF workss. CO2 could be captured utilizing amine dissolvers to scour the flue-gases. Amine dissolvers have already been widely used in the chemical and oil industry for CO2 gaining control, and this technique can be adapted for application on flue-gas watercourses. The aminoalkane go forthing the scrubber is heated to let go of high-purity CO2 and is so re-used.

Although amine scouring is comparatively straightforward in NGCC workss, extra steps are required in coal-burning workss to forestall taint of the recovered CO2 by other flue-gas drosss.

Post-combustion gaining control does hold its disadvantages. The low concentration of CO2 in power- station flue-gases means that a really big volume of flue-gas has to be treated. Equipment is correspondingly big and capital costs are high. If the gaining control engineering is based on a dissolver, such as aminoalkane, big sums of energy are required for solvent regeneration.

Using concentrated O alternatively of air for burning will increase CO2 concentrations in the flue-gas to, typically, more than 90 % . However, bring forthing the O requires expensive equipment and, once more, high degrees of energy ingestion.

Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture

A pre-combustion gaining control engineering, bring forthing a CO2 concentration of 35 % to 40 % , can avoid many of these jobs. Pre-combustion CO2 gaining control involves responding the fuel with O or air and, in some instances, steam, to bring forth a gas dwelling chiefly of C monoxide ( CO ) and H. A catalytic “shift” reaction with steam in a catalytic reactor ( switch convertor ) gives CO2 and more H. The CO2 is removed and the H passes to a gas turbine, or perchance a fuel cell. This technique needs more gas-purification phases when

applied to char or oil, instead than natural gas.

Most of the engineering required is good proven in ammonia production and other industrial procedures. However, the usage of H as a turbine fuel is fresh.

At least two turbine makers are seeking to set up standards for the burning of hydrogen-rich fuels.

Performance Of Known CO2 Capture Technologies

A survey by the International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gases R & A ; D Programme has estimated the following benefits and disadvantages for a new 500 MW gas- or coal-burning works integrating CO2 gaining control, with CO2 compaction to 110 saloon:

  • an 80 % decrease in CO2 emanations to the ambiance ;

  • a decrease in electrical coevals efficiency of between 8 and 13 per centum points ;

  • an addition in capital costs of between 50 % and 100 % ;

  • an addition in the cost of electricity coevals of approximately 50 % in gas-fired

  • workss and IGCC workss with pre-combustion gaining control, and about 70 % in PF

  • workss with post-combustion gaining control.

Other Opportunities For CO2 Capture

Certain industrial procedures, every bit good as oil and gas production Wellss, already produce concentrated watercourses of CO2. These could be captured at small cost.

Hydrogen might go established as a major fuel for autos, airplanes and heat and power coevals. Centralised, large-scale production of H from fossil fuels would be well-suited to pre-combustion gaining control of CO2 emanations.

Co2 Transportation

After gaining control, transit of CO2 to a long-run storage site would be by hard-hitting grapevine or by oiler. CO2 is mostly inert and easy handled and is already transported in big measures. In add-on, there are likely to be chances for power production to take topographic point at such long-run storage sites as coal beds and oil and gas reservoirs. Locating determinations will necessitate to take history of the fact that it is cheaper to shriek CO2 than to convey electricity.

Co2 Storage

Potential Storage Options

Carbon dioxide storage will be an effectual manner of avoiding clime alteration merely if the CO2 can be stored for several 100s or 1000s of old ages.

The four most promising storage options are: oil and gas reservoirs, deep saline reservoirs, unminable coal beds, and the deep ocean.

By comparing, other options are improbable to be economically competitory. These include storage in specially created belowground caverns, in a thermally insulated depository as solid dry ice or in carbonate signifier as a consequence of reaction with of course happening minerals.

Oil And Gas Reservoirs

Thousands of oil and gas reservoirs have been depleted to the extent that, given bing extraction techniques and current fuel monetary values, they are no longer feasible. The geology of these reservoirs is good understood. They are known to hold stored liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons for 1000000s of old ages and their existing substructure might be suited for CO2 storage. The natural-gas industry has routinely used depleted natural gas Fieldss for the belowground storage of natural gas.

It is besides possible to utilize CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery ( EOR ) in active, bring forthing oil and gas reservoirs, alternatively of bing energy-intensive EOR techniques ( Figure 2 ) . In some instances, the benefits would more than offset the costs of CO2 gaining control and injection.

Deep Saline Reservoirs

Deep aquifers that contain merely saline H2O and have a comparatively impermeable cap stone could be used to hive away CO2. In some formations, the CO2 would respond with minerals in the H2O to organize carbonates, thereby going locked up for good. Injection techniques would be similar to those used for low oil and gas Fieldss.

In the Norse Sleipner undertaking, CO2 is being separated from a natural gas watercourse and injected into a deep saline reservoir below the North Sea. The undertaking is being monitored and modelled as portion of an international enterprise established by Statoil, the Norse province oil company, with the IEA Greenhouse Gas R & A ; D Programme. This should assist to decide many of the uncertainnesss associated with storage in deep saline reservoirs.

Unminable Coal Beds

When CO2 is injected into unminable ( really deep ) coal beds, the CO2 is adsorbed onto the surface of the coal and displaces methane. The CO2 is locked up for good, provided the coal remains unmined. Because coal can adsorb, by volume, approximately twice every bit much CO2 as methane, the coal bed provides net CO2 storage, even if the displaced methane is burnt as a fuel. The IEA Greenhouse Gas R & A ; D Programme is assisting in a field trial of such enhanced coal-bed methane production, utilizing CO2 and nitrogen mixtures.

Deep Ocean

Injecting CO2 into the deep ocean is a longer-term option that would take advantage of the really slow natural interchange between the deep ocean and its surface beds. Computer theoretical accounts suggest that approximately 80 % of the CO2 injected at a deepness of 3,000 metres would still be retained in the ocean after 500 old ages. CO2 injected deeper than 3,000 metres at the ocean floor, would organize a lake of liquid CO2 or CO2 hydrate. This might farther widen keeping periods. Surveies are under manner to turn to the significant scientific uncertainness about the storage unity and environmental impact of ocean storage. Among these are the Climate Technology Initiative ( CTI ) Ocean Sequestration Project.

Environmental Deductions And Uncertainties

There are a figure of environmental impacts and uncertainities that need farther survey:

the length of clip the CO2 must stay stored in order to extenuate clime

alteration hazards ;

  • The consequence of slow or sudden release of CO2 on atmospheric CO2

  • Concentrations ;

  • The consequence of boring on the unity of depleted oil and gas field caps ;

  • Likely reactions between CO2 and belowground minerals, and their possible

  • Impact on CO2 segregation periods and on the unity of oil and gas field

  • Caps ;

  • The nature of deep saline reservoirs and their impact on CO2 storage over

  • Time ;

  • The possible impact of seismal activity ;

  • The impact on marine life of deep ocean storage of CO2 and of natural CO2

  • Absorption from the ambiance.

Confirmation

Accurate confirmation of the measures stored is indispensable if CO2 storage is to be used as a footing for emanations trading or to run into national committednesss to CO2 decrease. Accurate, low-priced measuring techniques already exist for storage of CO2 in depleted oil and gas Fieldss and deep saline reservoirs.

Validation of ocean storage is likely to be more hard and dearly-won, and appropriate techniques have yet to be developed.

Co2 Capture And Storage Costss

The IEA Greenhouse Gases R & A ; D Programme has estimated the costs of CO2 gaining control and storage for a scope of coal- and gas- discharged power workss, utilizing pre- and post-combustion gaining control techniques. The overall cost of CO2 gaining control and storage is about $ 40 to $ 60 per metric ton of CO2 emanations avoided. This compares favorably with other options, such as the widespread usage of renewable energy beginnings. The cost has three chief constituents:

  • CO2 gaining control and compaction to 110 saloon: $ 30 to $ 50 per metric ton of CO2 for a 500 MW gas- or coal-burning works at current fuel monetary values ;

  • transit by grapevine: $ 1 to $ 3 per metric ton of CO2 per 100 kilometer ;

  • storage: $ 1 to $ 3 per metric ton of CO2.

These costs are expected to fall as the engineering matures and the graduated table of application addition. The cost of CO2 gaining control and storage corresponds about to an addition in the monetary value of electricity of 1.5 – 3 US cents per kilowatt hr. For comparing, in 1998, domestic electricity users in the OECD paid between 7 and 14 cents per kilowatt hr. Industrial users paid 4 – 9 cents.

Key Technology Needs

Technology research and development, presentation undertakings and appraisals of the potency for CO2 gaining control and storage are taking topographic point in many states. Key engineering demands are:

  • accurate appraisal of geologic storage potency ;

  • field trials to find the destiny of CO2 injected into geologic formations ( oil and gas reservoirs, unminable coal beds and saline aquifers ) , and the deep

ocean, and its environmental impact ;

  • cost decrease of bing CO2 separation techniques ;

  • R & A ; D on fresh gaining control and storage engineerings ;

  • development of engineerings for the production, transit and usage of H derived from fossil fuels.

Recommendations For Policy Makers

To guarantee that the CO2 gaining control and storage engineering option is available in the coming decennaries, a major attempt is justified:

  • Existing attempts need to be linked together ;

  • new technological thoughts and attacks to co2 gaining control and storage should be smartly pursued ;

  • issues of storage unity and environmental impacts should be resolved quickly, through unfastened, crystalline research programmes ;

  • the surveies, R & A ; vitamin D and engineering presentations outlined supra demand to be comprehensively addressed ;

  • this can be achieved most quickly, and efficaciously, through the fullest possible international and public-private coaction ;

  • given its strategic importance as a potentially large-scale and low-cost extenuation engineering, the attending given to co2 gaining control and storage should at least be equal to that given to other major extenuation options, such as

  • Biomass, solar, atomic engineerings.

Successful declaration of these issues should take to recognition within the UNFCCC procedure of CO2 gaining control and storage as an effectual option for extenuating emanations of CO2.

×