An Overview of the Down Syndrome in Britain During the 1981

Category: Down Syndrome, Ethics
Last Updated: 24 May 2023
Pages: 3 Views: 214

In Britain, in 1981, a respected paediatrician was charged with the murder of an infant with Down Syndrome. The trial revealed that the parents had not wanted their child to live. The paediatrician had therefore prescribed a narcotic painkiller. Due to this evidence, the doctor was acquitted of all charges.

Were the intentions of these parents in the best interest of their child, or was it so that it could suit their lifestyle? I believe that the child had become too much of a hassle for them, than what they had bargained for. These parents were given the gift of being responsible for a life. The moment the child turned out in a way that they didn't expect, they didn't want that responsibility anymore. For all they knew, their child could have become one of the greatest minds in the world. If only the child was given the chance to live. This fact has been proven through and through. The same goes for someone who has a terminal illness and wants to die. A cure for that particular illness could have been discovered hours or even minutes after they decided to end their life.

We have no right as to decide who should live and who should die. Life is sacrosanct and is therefore worthy of protection-no matter in what circumstance it should present itself. I was taught that all living things have the right to a full life. By taking another life, even though permission was given, is still murder! If someone takes their own life, then it is regarded as suicide. It is as simple as that. We are always making acceptions, and allowing emotions to take the upper hand of us when beloved ones ask to die. This is a mistake that we continuously make and never learn from. By thinking that we are helping them to ease their pain by following their wishes, is quite ironic. For the rest of our lives we will have to carry the burden and heartache, of knowing that we took a beloved one's life. That terminally ill person should have known that by asking such a request, they were in turn spiritually handing over their pain to someone else. How can people do this to each other!

Order custom essay An Overview of the Down Syndrome in Britain During the 1981 with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

Nature has set out the cycle for when life should begin as well as end. Since man has created advanced technology, he has taken over nature's duty. Man has now the ability of deciding whether life should carry on or not. This is our biggest mistake. No wonder there are all of these incurable diseases and disfigured children. We cannot blame nature, but only ourselves. Nature is like a mother who only wants what is best for her child. But if the child-who is mankind, grows up and then becomes independent. He takes his mother for granted, thinking that he no longer needs her. But when he is trouble, eventually the only person that can help him out, is but only his mother.

Philosophers such as Socrates, Plato and Stoics believed that morally Euthanasia was acceptable. These great minds should have realised that they did not fully understand the consequences of this belief. If governments accept this to be part of the constitution, this would lead to the compulsory killing of those whom the institutes consider to be socially unstable. If the right to a full life is taken away, then mankind will be the cause of his own extinction.

Cite this Page

An Overview of the Down Syndrome in Britain During the 1981. (2023, May 24). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/an-overview-of-the-down-syndrome-in-britain-during-the-1981/

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer