Living Like Weasels

Category: Annie Dillard, Philosophy, Psychology

Last Updated: 25 May 2023

Pages: 2 Views: 705

ANNIE DILLARD LIVING LIKE WEASELS Together answer: "How is the Dillard essay constructed? " Do describe each of its parts. 17 paragraphs in five acts (parts) Characteristic features: explanation of meaning pages 1-2 Premonition: Wild, ETS story, talons, bones and death in life in death. 63 3-7 Setting -- time and place. Hollins/Murray's Pond (Walden) sunset in suburbia! 63-64 8-11 THE ENCOUNTER; a shocking, world changing - view ; an upsetting event! 64-65 12-14 Reflection on the loss and what this means; thoughtful people are not so free. 5 15-17 The didactic quality, meaning or lesson of this story: she tells you how to live! 65-66 Her conclusive remarks 15 symbiosis two minds become one as open as the land is to snow! 16 freedom of necessity (not as customarily thought -- of will to choose) 17 life advice on how to live "grasp your one necessity" What uses does this author make of "premonition? " That is how does she utilize imagery to foreshadow some later reuse of images or phrases to tell a story or deepen her initial memory of this experience? eize grip wild rose stunned stillness bondage vs. necessity What happens? She meets her equal, in a weasel (lowly rodent)! The use of IRONY to forcefully convey an unconventional comparison of a thinking human and a thoughtless animal. Characteristics are: weasels are: wild predatory hunters Although startled easily, they are–nonetheless–tenacious stalkers. living in their "physical senses" determined persistent free perseverance. We should be as "proper, obedient & pure" & "not let go" survivors of even death ¶14 noticing everything, remembering nothing 15 Down is a good place to go Could two live under the wild rose ¶16 "perfect freedom of single necessity Answer her question in ¶ #15; "Could two live that way? " No this is absurd, even irritating, to think we can give up our mental faculties perhaps this is the unity nature requires and to which we may strive but never reach Yes as partners or the child at the breast of the mother, friends & stalkers, real lovers What does Dillard mean by equating freedom & necessity in ¶#16 she reverses (irony) our usual notion of freedom to choose ree is equated –instead– with instinctually free from thought, emotion, or conscience humans are slaves to ideas, the mind, the ideology of the group, fads wild animals are free even from death because they are true –tenacious– to their instincts The point is:marriage of necessity we need to treat nature as a partner, participant and even lover "This is yielding, not fighting" (¶16) Learn how to live! "Then even death.... can not you part. " (¶14-17)

Order custom essay Living Like Weasels with free plagiarism report