College sports is a multi-million-dollar industry, with some of the stars of the show claiming they get no share of that money. They have been offered a college education, and the title of an amateur athlete and many hope to go on to professional careers. But for over a decade the debate has continued.
Should college athletes be paid apart from scholarships? The supporters argue that there would be no revenue at all for any school, advertisers, or sponsors, if not for the athletes on the field. And the college football system already functions as a “minor league” for the NFL. Further, athletes are forbidden from taking gifts and selling autographs. Former UCLA linebacker, and president of the College Athletes Players Association, Ramogi Huma, recently complained that athletic scholarships did not even cover the full costs of college.
According to The New York Times, “In 2012 he (Huma) worked on a study with Drexel professor Ellen Staurowsky that found the average scholarship fell short of what top-division football players needed by more than $3,000 a year, while more than 80% of athletes playing football on "full scholarship" lived below the poverty line. What’s more, the study found that if revenues were shared among players and owners as in pro sports, each Division I football player would be worth $137,357 per year.” These concerns prompted Huma to help Northwestern University football players attempt to unionize. Their arguments were heard by the National Labor Relations Board, which ruled the football players were not university employees, and could not be allowed to engage in collective bargaining to seek payments and settle disputes.
Though a victory for the university-sports establishment, the five-member board based their ruling on the guideline that unionization would not promote “stability in labor relations.” Critics say they avoided the main issue: “The board did not rule directly on the central question in the case — whether the players, who spend long hours on football and help generate millions of dollars for Northwestern, are university employees.” But once the question of paying college athletes is raised, what are the limits?
Should all players be paid or just the stars? Should a backup kicker be paid the same as a Heisman-winning quarterback? Should the women's golf team receive the same payments, though the program that is not making money, but costing the university money? If an athlete is hurt and can't play for a year, should they still get a paycheck?
Should band members and cheerleaders be paid also? Would high school athletes choose colleges based on a bidding war? Who could pay them the most? Perhaps this is the reason the question remains debated and not resolved. That there is no one answer, but to simply raise the question generated countless other questions.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? Should college athletes be paid? This question has been the subject of debate for many years. There are pros and cons to both sides of the issue, but college athletes deserve to be paid for several reasons. One reason is …
College Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid While catching up on some game day scores for college football, an article popped up on the side with a title reading, College Athletes Deserve To Be Paid. I noticed it was written by Michael Wilbon, one of the hosts …
Samuel Wingert Professor Grimm ENG100G Midterm Research Paper 18 October 2012 Collegiate Level “Pay to play? That’s the question being fiercely debated on campuses and across the college conferences. And it’s shocking to see the level of support the answer “yes” is getting—because the idea …
Within the past few years, the question of whether college athletes should be paid or not has created much attention for those concerned with NCAA regulations. Specifically Division I schools have these concerns; they are the teams contributing in the bowl games and March madness …
Recently, it has been brought to attention whether college athletes should be paid or not. Many different opinions have been formed on this topic, however I do not think they should be paid. This can be assumed considering all the advantages and privileges that the …
Keyon Billie Ms. Gavin Speech Class 3/25/2013 Over the past few years college athletics have gained immense popularity across the United States. Whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, ever since the turn of the century, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of revenue …
In our generation of collegiate sports, there is an ongoing dilemma surrounding the idea of monetary compensation and student athletes. The idea of athletes getting paid is usually disregarded because many still buy into the myth of “amateur athletics” and believe that these athletes should …
Walmmer together with Roy have something in common. They have suffered serious disputes in time of their contracts. The disputes they suffer regards to salary and how they do perform, at some point, they are forced to fight their stand to prove themselves. NCAA face …
College football is one of America’s favorite pastimes, but in the south it is more of a lifestyle. Whether it is the hard hits, 90,000 screaming fans, or just the thrill that comes from watching a game something about it makes fans tune in. However, …
An amateur is a person who plays a sport such as basketball, football, and soccer the sports playing amateur is pleased by the activity for the job. Amateur is the definition that the NCAA goes by to deny college athletes from profiting off their jersey …
It takes a lot of work to be a student athlete, both athletically and academically. College sports consumes the same amount of time as a full-time work. College athletes devote at least 40 hours a week to their chosen sport, which includes both sports and …
College athletics has grown in popularity over the last 20 years or so, resulting in significant income for the NCAA and its subsidiaries. The controversy over whether college athletes should be charged in addition to their scholarships has yet to be resolved. Some claim that …
To pay or not to pay, that is the question. This is the biggest question being asked about college athletes today. Should athletes receive money for their hard work and dedication, or is a free- education more than enough. College athletics is a multibillion dollar …
In 2015 the top five National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) schools brought in, on average, 170 million dollars and the NCAA as a whole reached an all time high of nearly one billion in revenue (USA Today). This is all thanks to the over 460 …
In the United States, there are over 420,000 NCAA student-athletes at over 1,000 member institutions. Across all sports in all divisions, the yearly revenue for the NCAA is $10.6 billion. The average Football and Men’s Basketball profit at a Division 1 school is $15.8 million …
Every year big football and basketball programs generate billions of dollars from tickets and merchandise. The coaches get a cut the schools get a cut and obviously the NCAA gets a cut from the money made. But the players are not getting paid for playing …
Allan Geui is not like most college athletes. Geui attends Cal State Northridge, a smaller Division I university. He won $40,000 at a shooting competition as a senior in high school. Under NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) rules, he could have kept the money, but …
Save time and let our verified experts help you.
Hire writer
