Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized I personally believed that euthanasia should not be legalized. Euthanasia is the easiest way for someone to end his or her life which can be done through drug overdose, a lethal injection or the withdrawal of medical support. In other words, it is the act of killing a patient. According to Luke Gormally, euthanasia is a type of killing which cannot be put up in a legal system since it is against human being. (2) Hence, it shows that euthanasia should not be legalized. The writer states that the physical suffering of terminally ill patients will come to an end if euthanasia is legalized.
It is rational but according to Burke J. Balch, J. D. , and David Waters, managing and controlling the pain of the patient is better than killing them. (1) Ending the physical suffering of ill patients means that they will die. Killing a patient is not controlling the pain but it is a murder. Physical suffering of terminally ill patients should be cured instead of killed. Those who work with dying people know that majority of those patient want their pain controlled but do not want to be killed. With the advancement of technology in medical treatment, there must be some way to overcome the pain.
So, there is no need for legalization of euthanasia. The writer also argues that financial burden of the patient’s families will be lessened if euthanasia is legalized. This is logically relevant since it is true that the cost of getting daily treatment is higher than the cost of ending life early. However, there are some cases where family members want their ill family to be forced to euthanasia for their personal gains like wealth inheritance. Their true motive is not to end the patient suffering or to conserve their financial crisis, but to get rid of the patient who stands in their way from getting the inheritance.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Analyze the Euthanasia Essay
just from $13,9 / page
Therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized for the sake of the patient. In addition, the writer claims that euthanasia will terminate mental suffering of the ill patient. This is illogically relevant since euthanasia is not the only way to terminate mental suffering of the ill patient. D. A. Munroe (2010) states that people who ask for euthanasia are not people with terminal illnesses but are depressed. A study conducted by Dr Ezekiel J. Emanuel, a bioethicist at the US National Institutes of Health, shows that psychological distress, including depression and hopelessness are a major factor in euthanasia equests. (4) The psychological distress of the patient creates unwarranted self-blame and will come up with the idea of killing themselves. The support from relatives and their friend is needed to overcome this situation. Hence, it has nothing to do with euthanasia. In conclusion, based on the reasons above, I strongly think that the disadvantages of legalizing euthanasia outweigh advantages. By legalizing euthanasia, morals that have been practiced for thousands of years are ignored. Death should be of natural occurrence, without intervention from mankind because human has the right to live longer.
Remember. This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper from our expert writers