Essays on Aquinas Cosmological Argument

The cosmological argument is an argument for the existence of God that is based on the fact that the universe exists. The argument goes like this:1. Everything that exists has a cause.2. The universe exists.3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause.4. The only thing that could cause the universe is an uncaused, powerful, and intelligent being that we call God.The cosmological argument is a very powerful argument for the existence of God. It is based on a simple principle that everything that exists has a cause. The universe exists, therefore it must have a cause. The only thing that could cause the universe is an uncaused, powerful, and intelligent being that we call God.

Thomas Aquinas' Five Arguments for the Existence of God are as follows:The first argument is based on the idea that there must be a first cause of everything. Aquinas reasoned that since everything has a cause, there must be a first cause that is not itself caused by anything else. This first cause is what we know as God.The second argument is based on the idea of necessary existence. Aquinas reasoned that since there are things in the world that do not have the property of necessary existence (i.e. they could conceivably not exist), there must be something that does have this property. This necessary being is what we know as God.The third argument is based on the idea of causation. Aquinas reasoned that since everything in the world is caused by something else, there must be an uncaused cause of everything. This uncaused cause is what we know as God.The fourth argument is based on the idea of contingency. Aquinas reasoned that since everything in the world is contingent (i.e. it could conceivably not exist), there must be something that is not contingent. This necessary being is what we know as God.The fifth and final argument is based on the idea of degree. Aquinas reasoned that since there are things in the world that are more perfect than others, there must be something that is the most perfect being imaginable. This most perfect being is what we know as God.

The first is that it relies on an unproven assumption, namely that the universe had a beginning. Science has shown that the universe is expanding, but there is no evidence that it began at a specific point in time. The second is that the argument relies on the concept of cause and effect, which is not always applicable. For example, the Big Bang could be seen as the cause of the universe, but it is also possible that the universe has always existed. The third is that the cosmological argument does not explain why there is something rather than nothing. It is possible that the universe always existed, or that it came into existence without a cause. Finally, the argument does not explain what caused the universe to come into existence. It is possible that the universe was created by a god, but it is also possible that it came into existence through natural processes.