Comparing the Similarities Between the Articles Three Steps We Can Take to Solve Poverty and What is Poverty?
The War on Poverty did not become a collectivized federal effort until President Lyndon B Johnson introduced legislation in 1964. The phrase has become a buzzword since then, with politicians and everyday citizens giving their two cents on the issue. There are many different opinions on poverty and the nation’s fight to end it, Tianna Gaines-Turner, author of “Three Steps We Can Take to Solve Poverty, From Someone Who Knows Firsthand," gives detailed instructions in a proposal to Congress on how to fix poverty in America Jo Goodwin Parker, the author of “What is Poverty?", uses her essay to explain what living in poverty is like, which answers her titular question The most obvious similarity between the two articles (besides the authors’ backgrounds) is the use of pathos to address America‘s poverty crisis Parker’s essay is by all means a personal account, using memories to answer the title.
Gaines-Turner uses her personal recollection of memories as a persuasive tool in her recommendations to Congress. Gaines-Turner uses her life in poverty as support to her claims, while Parker uses it simply to explain her hardships Another similarity is the authors’ writing styles. Both Parker and Gaines-Turner address their intended audience directly, in order to evoke a more profound reactions Parker’s first sentence addresses the reader as “you,” making the reader an active member in her essay. She uses this form to reach deeper than a bland informational essay Parker’s writing style allows her to ask the reader questions and eventually provoke action. Gaines—Turner’s audience is different, but her writing style is similar to Parker’s Gaines» Turner is addressing the House Budget Committee, which leads that it and the whole of Congress are her audiences.
She testifies to this collection on the behalf of the people in her community, and her writing style helps the “Three Steps” author to testify effectively. Gaines—Turner often addresses the Committee and Congress directly, using “you” in sentences that seem to make the Congressmen more accountable for their actions. The effective use of this writing style cautions Congress in its decisions, and makes the bond between speaker and audience stronger than a proposal that exclusively refers to Congress in the third person. Though similar in their rhetoric and writing style, Parker and Gaines-Turner have multiple differences to their articles, For one, the times at which the articles were written are drastically different, Though a testimony to the faultiness of LBJ ‘s legislation, the articles have opposing sentence and paragraph structure.
Order custom essay Comparing the Similarities Between the Articles Three Steps We Can Take to Solve Poverty and What is Poverty? with free plagiarism report
450+ experts on 30 subjects
Starting from 3 hours delivery
Additionally, Parker‘s essay refrains from giving a solution to her predicament, asking for help but not detailing how. She asks the reader not to give pity, but to “look at us with an angry heart, anger that will help.” Gaines-Turner, on the other hand, uses her position to recommend to Congress how to solve povenyishe even does so in a convenient three-step proposal. She ultimately asks Congress to use the expertise of those who experience poverty firsthand in order to solve “America‘s most urgent security crisis.” Besides detailing a plan to fix and eradicate poverty, Gaines-Turner sets herself apart from Parker even more with her use of statistics and logic. She uses dollar amounts, percentages, and logically sound suggestions to support her pitch to Congress, which ultimately reinforces the fact that she is knowledgeable and well-versed in this issue.
Both Jo Goodwin Parker and Tianna Gaines-Turner ask their audience to help those living in poverty, but one author does so more persuasively than the other. Gaines—Turner’s address to Congress is more convincing in her approach because she uses all three rhetorical appeals to the best of her ability. Parker views poverty as inescapable, and her article lacks any plan or proposal to help those in situations similar to hers. Gaines-Turner understands that it is extremely difficult to move above poverty, and so she asks Congress to change and add federal legislation to help mobilize the poor and stimulate their economic standing. Both authors have proven that we can all learn something from those living in poverty if we just listen, like Parker asked, and allow the poor to be active members in ending their unfortunate circumstances like Gaines-Turner proposed.
Cite this Page
Comparing the Similarities Between the Articles Three Steps We Can Take to Solve Poverty and What is Poverty?. (2023, Mar 15). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/comparing-the-similarities-between-the-articles-three-steps-we-can-take-to-solve-poverty-and-what-is-poverty/
Run a free check or have your essay done for you
