Comparison of Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park and The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park

Analysis, Findings, And Discussions

Introduction

This chapter will be discussed and explains the analysis and findings from two mentioned surveys every bit well as the literature reappraisal through comparative analysis. The facets that will be used to compare are site background, end and design attack, design layout, comfortss, hardscape and softscape choice, handiness and circulation every bit good as the activities. Those aspects are considered dependable from literature reappraisal to be portion of urban park design planning. This chapter will stop up with the treatment of analysis both parks which are Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park every bit good as The North Lynnwood Park

Site Background

Both Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park and The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park are different types of park but those park are similar in using Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design rules which seek to hold nothing offense in the park.

Table 4.1 shows the comparison of the basic background for both parks.

Table 4.1 Comparison of site background for both parks.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
Entire country: 17 estates. Built by Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission ( M-NCPPC ) Parks in 1962. Include community centre, features resort areas, a softball field, two multiuse Fieldss, four tennis tribunals, a football or association football field and a picnic country.	Entire country: 6 estates. Developed in 1970 and initiated by Lynnwood Elementary School instructors, every bit good as the pupils. Include big active drama, picnic country, an out-of-door public presentation infinite, spray Parkss and new drama equipment known as “Dragon Park” .

Based on the tabular array above, both Parkss attract public because it’s operation as a topographic point for socialize every bit good as there are besides provided several diversion installations for recreational activities. The Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park consist of several installations within the park which may be used by batch of people in one clip. As compared to the North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park, it is besides consist of installations as usual for a park, but the figure of user may be somewhat different.

Goal and design attack

Goal and design attack is of import and considered in design planning because of peculiar Parkss must lies on that facet. These facet is based on how the end will be achieved through the selected attack in developing a good park. From both mention surveies, it seem that both park has their ain end but used the same attack which is CPTED to accomplish a good park.

For Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park, it wants to make a successful park every bit good as the unfastened infinite system in the hereafter through the devising of being Parkss and unfastened infinites as utile and attractive as possible and besides making the right every bit good as suitable of new comforts and linkages within the park.

The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park besides has about the same purpose which is to supply appropriate new diversion installations every bit good as redevelop the bing 1s and make a new out-of-door public presentation infinite for Lynnwood Elementary School pupils and occupants. But, both Parkss have to accomplish the purpose through several aims that might be different.

Table 4.2 The different aims used by both parks to accomplish the end.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
I. Supply more visibleness to other installations in the park such as the resort area, hoops and others. two. Better a better entree control in covering with vehicular and prosaic traffic. three. Supply better natural surveillance for those who entered the park.	I. Supply installations for diversion activities based on the user needs. two. Develop recreational resources and chances that are built-in in the landscape and outdoor atmosphere that may include walking, jogging, biking every bit good as continuing the natural countries.

Harmonizing to the comparison of two mentioned surveys, both park are taking about the same end but in different manner to accomplish it but still based on CPTED rules. The Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park is indirectly giving a comfy and secured atmosphere for the users as to allow the relaxation for better natural surveillance and supply more visibility to other installations. Compared to The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park had intended to repair up the installations with the new one within the park to make a better atmosphere as the park is used by the school kids every bit good as the occupants which to maintain out fright of offenses.

Design Layout

A good park design is due to the planning of a good layout puting which is the right and suited combination of workss every bit good as the characteristics will make a pleasing visual aspect and an environmentally friendly layout which mean a safer park. Through the two mention surveies, the design layout was compared to find the design which sing the offense bar schemes.

Table 4.3 The difference design layout of two mention surveies.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park

The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park was networking within the park linked to each other of the pathway and the cycleway every bit good as the planting strategy. These are the possibility to make hiding infinite within the full layout of the park. The Gwendolyn Coffield Community Center becomes a focal point of the park since the installations provided are around the center. The installations that are provided are designated to be at the border of the park margin to guarantee natural surveillance within the park.

The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park is designed by positioning the looping pathway at the center of the park to be the focal point. The prosaic paseo was created to buffer by trees and other plantings. The design of the park every bit good as the external layout supplies more inclusion of corners that can hide people by twenty-four hours or dark. The planting strategy gives the obstructor of public’s position as the structural planting is planted at the margin of the park every bit good as to deny entree to offense marks and to make a perceptual experience of hazards to wrongdoers.

Based on the tabular array above, the circulation and pathway are every bit good as the cycleway is appropriate to the design counsel for both Parkss as a good park design. This is designed to let walking within the park every bit good as such a desired line for the users. The planting strategy played the same function of circulation, pathway, and cycleway due to the CPTED rules which is the natural entree control.

Apart from that, both park have their ain focal point which is a topographic point that people will garner or play around. For Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park, the community centre shown in Figure 3.6 act as a focal point of the park because the installations provided are around the centre which is to guarantee natural surveillance within the park. While focal point for the North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park is the looping pathway because of its place which is at the center of the park. The focal point is one of the facets for a good park design that act as natural surveillance.

Comforts, hardscape, and softscape choice

The comforts and hardscape choice of the urban parks is sensible to be compared with looking at the offense bar facet as these provided in that park is influence to make societal interaction among the users. For soft scape choice every bit good as landscaping played function to heighten the natural agreeableness in the park. It is of import, nevertheless, to guarantee that heavy leaf and inappropriate planting do non take to chances for privacy and possible offense.

Table 4.4 Comparison of comforts, and hardscape choice for both Parks.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
A big unfastened space/ resort area A multi-use football and association football field A baseball field Two tennis tribunals One and a half hoops tribunals Community centre Security illuming within the park	Spray park Reservable field day installations Large active drama countries Play Equipment Basketball Court Outdoor Stages/Performance Area Public toilets Parking

Based on the tabular array 4.4, the comforts are every bit good as the hardscape provided in Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park are accessible in footings of security facet as the characteristics is accommodating security component as the comforts and the infinite provided can make a societal atmosphere. Harmonizing to Cranz, people will utilize the park for their sociable infinite where people get to utilize ephemeral scenes, run into friends do other recreational activities. Compared to The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park, the park provided good comforts, but the hardscape characteristics of the park is rather unequal to back up the safe environment.

Table 4.5 Comparison of softscape choice for both parks.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
The park encompasses about 70 % of plantings. This is possible to do a fly-by-night country every bit good as to supply screen for related and suited activities. The planting choice need to suit the local ecology and recreational context.	The workss choice is making a form which is covering at the border of the park. The usage of workss are to give and supply the coloring material every bit good as the texture of planting.

Based on tabular array 4.5, softscape choice is an of import component in a park which it’s played a different function due to the local surrounding. This is because each setting strategy will be reflecting the image of the park.

Accessibility and circulation

Accessibility and circulation aspect played a function in developing a good and better park. The design fundamentally heightens the existent and perceived safety of paseo users, by avoiding from taking people into unsafe states of affairs or countries.

Table 4.6 Comparison of the handiness and circulation of both Parks.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
The handiness or street layout provided to take the motion of the users within the park is clearly where it is connected to the whole country.	The form of park’s handiness or street layout is more to make the natural way scene and the circulation of the way design is excessively loopy.

Based on table 4.6, both Parks seem to give and allow the users enjoy the different atmosphere of the park through a different form of handiness every bit good as circulation. Unfortunately, both circulation design is belong to the design counsel of park. The design of pathway should be more in the direct desire lines because the direct entree will allow in making more concealed topographic points.

Activity

Basically, each park will supply the public societal infinite, lawn country every bit good as recreational installations as a topographic point that signifiers and creates activity for the societal and environmental wellness of communities. These will indirectly give some basic counsel for offense decrease within the park.

Table 4.7 Activities of both Parkss.

Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park
Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park supplying a batch of infinite for activities that may include athleticss, fittingness, dance, music, art, or the chance to fall in together with friends and neighbors for a particular jubilation or societal assemblage which to guarantee the park is full used.	The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park supplying out-of-door public presentations infinite which include two phases, amphitheater seating and a big mounting bowlder for the intent of making other activities to do the park more energetic.

Based on the tabular array above, both Parkss somewhat supply the same activities to maintain and guarantee the Parkss utile to the users every bit good as the occupants. The development of unfastened infinite programs which heighten the ocular agreeableness of a country does non hold the possibility to endanger the safety of the users. So, the more ocular comforts are provided within the park, there more activities will occur.

Drumhead

From the comparative analysis made between Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park and The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park, it can be concluded that the chief consideration of forestalling offense in the urban park are site background, end and design attack, design layout, comforts, hardscape and softscape choice, handiness and circulation every bit good as the activities aspect. These should go the design guidelines during the spacial design in developing a successful urban park based on CPTED rules. Both Parkss showed a good attack in using the CPTED rules through that aspect. Hence, the design guidelines for the urban park should see the strengths from both Parkss order to make a zero-offense environment every bit good as a comfy and safer atmosphere within the park.

Mentions

1. McCormick, J. ( 2006 ). Design Against Crime. National Recreation and Park Association
2. Drakakis, S. and David, W. ( 1981 ). Urbanization, Housing, and the Development Procedure. London: Croom Helm.
3. Jamil bin Abu Bakar ( 2002 ). A Design Guide for Public Parks in Malaysia. Johor Darul Ta’zim: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
4. Singapore National Crime Prevention Council ( 2003 ). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Guidebook. Singapore: Singapore Public Affairs Department.

Cite this Page

Comparison of Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park and The North Lynnwood Neighbourhood Park. (2017, Jul 05). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/comparison-of-rosemary-hills-lyttonsville-local-park-and-the-north-lynnwood-neighbourhood-park/

copy to clipboard