One of our divisions makes an electric scooter:
Classic case of where a designer looking for new modes of ultra light transportation came across the scooter and electrified it. Boy, people said he was crazy. Kids begged their parents not to ride one (shame) and a cop said, It’s not a moped. It’s not a motorcycle. It’s not anything and I don’t ride anything when I’m not sure what it is. Best example I know of why designers have to be free to do their thing without having market researchers be responsible for picking up on market trends.
According to an adage, the mother of invention is necessity. When man finds himself faced with adversity, he starts to become creative as to find ingenious ways to discover a solution to a pressing problem.
Order custom essay New Product Management with free plagiarism report
In this caselet, the problem of the designer is coming up with new modes of mobility probably with the following features: portable enough to weave through traffic, light enough to carry or push without additional hand or fast and mobile enough to consume little amount of gas. This is a classic example of an end justifying the means, and a solution that will address three problematic issues of the modern world: traffic, oil prices and a sense of independence in terms of machine breakdown.
The comments made by the kids and the cop manifest the usual skepticism of the many as soon as something new comes into the world to revolutionize something, which later on, is nevertheless learned to be appreciated for its pragmatism and practicality. But the best observation in the case is that of providing the elbowroom and freedom to designers and inventors to work their way through inventing or discovering solutions to the pressing societal and technological issues of the times. Take the case of the graduates of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) or the California Institute of Technology (CalTech) who are known to create patents after patents of new technology for almost anything everyday.
This is a case between design by the artists and functionality by the engineers. This is also a case where both are correct and that both the design and functionality are necessary for a certain product or proposed product to sell and create a phenomenon in the market with. Both are correct, in fact are necessary to achieve full realization of the commercial potential of a certain product. Complementation is a strategy where products and services can best serve their synergy of usefulness in terms of characteristics that fills in where the other is lacking.
Design is what makes a product attractive to the buyer. It is value-added feature of a thing that enhances the ownership and sometimes even its functionality. Functionality is the characteristics of a thing that represents its primary reason for being, such as a tool or implement. Often design and functionality complement each other although there are cases where design and functionality affects each other. But the real issue between design and functionality is how best can these preferences be adopted on a complementary basis without one affecting the other or how best can they be considered together that all the more enhances each other.
A classic example is a car where the design and functionality may not complement each other but has the potential of evolving a design that best complements each other. Other examples are websites (Barnard, 2007), residential houses, furniture, equipment and similar items where functionality and design can actually find create a dominant synergy beyond expectations.
The most important consideration in the redesign for the Mini for the US car market was the growing issue of utility and aesthetics. Utility here represents the inherent cost savings, the maneuverability and the cute, colorful compact nature of the Mini. Aesthetics is the design attractiveness to the buyer. All these were highlighted in the promotional materials before the launching that made the American buying public anticipate with curious expectations. The remake and showing of the movie, The Italian Job made the buying public more interested in trying for themselves the MiniCooper phenomenon themselves.
The nature of the US car market is its penchant for design and functionality win everything. The Mini Cooper is one car that can be designed to “personally speak” for the owner itself. Along this line, the customization preferences allowed for buyers is a strong benefit for the marketing of the Mini Cooper.
BMW is already known for its quality in terms of durability, engineering and functionality. This is where design and functionality can work together: The Mini Cooper…by BMW. This tagline is a powerful selling point: the colorful design of the Mini Cooper and the superb functionality quality of the BMW name.
In redesigning the Beetle or the Thunderbird, the careful merger of the nostalgic name and the functionality of modern technology are to be considered. Buyers would think they are buying two things in a car – its former fame and glory of the past and the application of basic and value-added functionality of the present. You explained earlier how the new product team leader…like a conductor and a quarterback. What do you think he had in mind?
New product teams in most dynamic organizations become the new breed of directors and managers next to the higher level, multifunctional group. The latter is the traditional project teams – the primary circle of decision makers and actors behind the success of most organizational teams.
Cross functional teams as they now call it, is a group composed of members with various degrees of competencies aiming to resolve an issue with the best quality approach and with the longest-term benefit possible. Members of the team come from various disciplines which are equally impacted by the organizational issues being resolved. Thus, their participation in the team is a means to address, at the expert level, the implications of resolving an issue along their areas of expertise. This approach gives an organization an assurance that issues resolved by a cross functional team (CFT) is the best approach with the least consequences to decision making.
The analogy to the role of the conductor and a quarterback is the latter’s role as the leader of an offensive team, tasked with calling the play, initiating all plays as he receives the ball. The quarterback takes the snap, runs with the ball, call the shots, do a forward pass. The most visible roles on the team, he handles the ball at every play. He exudes a great deal of responsibility both in directing play strategies as well as decisions during a play.
Hence, like the new product teams, the leadership vigor of the conductor of an orchestra and the quarterback of a football team determines the symphony produced by the various instruments as well as the synchronized play staged by the members of the offensive football team towards a successful conclusion of a team undertaking. The conductor and the quarterback are critical to the team play. Their enthusiasm and rhythm in the play are, and should be contagious and spontaneous to give assurance, motivations as well as directions to each player in the group.
You mentioned culture….what kind of a culture do you like best in the classroom where you are using this book? Is that culture consistent with the general idea of management we have had for years?
This culture-management phenomenon is one critical issue in the effective management of organizations. In effect, they are opposing forces that confuse the organizations into thinking that what each member of the organization is doing is part of real management in the team, when in fact, they are plain practices derived from interpretation of management policies. Culture here represents the gap between what needs to be done (management) and what is actually done and how it is done (which is culture). Culture is a very powerful force in an organization, hence the root word cult.
Culture can determine the outcome of every management function as well as the quality of that outcome. Although there are cases where culture can actually help the organization achieve its objective faster, but there is an equal amount and degree of constraints on management caused by cultural anomalies.
In the classroom, the prevailing culture is one that is emerging in terms of the composite nature of every member of the class including that of the lecturer. Their individual cultural traits merge into a unified behavioral reactions that determine the distinct identity of the class and this usually differs in another class handled by another teacher or another class handled by the same teacher. Often, the classroom culture varies with the ideal classroom management scenario.
The modern times demand respect for and from every component of an organization. Empowerment is implied and must be exercised. Further, the organization is a team and the team must be motivated to achieve the organizational goals and objectives. The critical area here would be how to align culture with management. The consequential problem is how culture and management can conspire to create an ideal working atmosphere and relationship, if ever this is possible.
Case: Marko Products
Wong knew that putting a structure into place was not enough—the people in any structure had to work effectively as a group. So please take what ever organization option you choose for the nonscientific medical office equipment and then go through the following topics commenting how each topic would relate specifically to the equipment group management
- culture,
- team ownership
- selecting the leader
- need for product champions
- compensating the team.
Case: Product use testing for new consumer nondurables
What do you think would be the biggest concern about each of these products that might be unearthed using product use testing? Using the list of product use testing decisions given in this chapter, make recommendations as to how some or all of these could have been product use tested prior to launch?
The following concerns are might be considered and earthed in the product use testing of the items lined out in the case problems:
For the Kellog Special K Plus
The packaging and reclosing mechanism might just prove to be sensitive and volatile not only to the chemical elements present in the cereal but on the applicability of the gable box top for the product itself.
Coca-cola Surge
The consuming public might think that Coca Cola has run out of ideas to name its traditionally excellent products. The pitfall in naming new products against successful ones will indicate a strategy of mimicking products already in the market. Competitors might not like the idea and capitalize on this principle to destroy the new entrant.
Uncle Ben’s Rice with Calcium
Using the testimonial of an association to endorse a product has its advantages and disadvantages. More than its advantages, the downside of group testimonial on the consumer sector is that the company relies heavily on the external factors of the products rather the merit of the products itself. Testimonials are often associated with huge compensation in advertising for the use of the testimonial. If the person giving the testimonial suddenly gets involved in some form of contrary scandals which has happened to a number of new products and existing products, the product as well as the company suffers together with the endorser.
Avert Virucidal Tissue
The use of the word AVERT might not sit well with many consumers in the market. What is to be averted? In hygiene products, it become better to use something soft, tender and caring is recommended to give the buyer some denotations of comfort of even appreciating the name of the product itself and what it can do and not what it will AVERT.
Wheaties Dunk-A-Ball Cereal
This product might not be appreciated by parents in times when kids should be eating and not playing. This will contradict the table manners children need to be trained. Mothers might no longer patronize the product once damage is done not only on the breakfast table but on children getting injured in the play that is implied in the use of the cereal.
References
- Barnard, Hannah June 18th, 2007, Design vs. Functionality, HTML Primer, Retrieved November 21, 2008
- http://www.htmlprimer.com/articles/design-vs-functionality
Cite this Page
New Product Management. (2018, Jul 04). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/new-product-management-2/
Run a free check or have your essay done for you