Research Paper: Crime Prevention Strategies

Last Updated: 01 Mar 2023
Essay type: Research
Pages: 9 Views: 291
Table of contents

The focus of this paper will be based on different crime prevention strategies implemented by members of the communities, and local and government authorities. It will focus mainly on those practices involving community cooperation and portray how they are successful or unsuccessful in reducing criminality in high-crime areas. Firstly, the topic of this research report is clearly stated below. The methods used to acquire the information contained in this research report are also described below.

The literature review discusses the three main themes found in the allocated articles relating to community crime prevention. These include techniques to reduce juvenile crime; fear of crime between community members and the social divides that are created by implementing community crime prevention strategies. The findings discuss, in-depth, the effects of the three themes mentioned above once these prevention strategies were implemented. It gives examples of people's experiences with crime and crime prevention. Finally, the discussion presents the outcomes achieved, which are shown by the various authors. It also touches on the government’s involvement and how it can be improved. The conclusion sums up all the findings in this report and gives an idea of future hope for less crime.

Research Question (or hypothesis)

Order custom essay Research Paper: Crime Prevention Strategies with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

‘What are the leading practices in the field of community crime prevention? You can choose to either research and discuss a wide range of different community crime prevention strategies, or focus on an example of a particular technique and research its successes, limitations, and applications. ’ The topic of this paper discusses community crime prevention.

It talks about a range of different types of prevention strategies that are used to reduce or minimize crime-targeted areas or fields. The various effects of these strategies are shown throughout the report.

Research (including methodologies)

Before composing this research report, the methodology exercised for this task was content analysis. Content analysis demands the reader to read 'in between the lines'. Its main requirement is to draw conclusions from the information presented and apply it to the point being made.

The requirements of this methodology are to research and locate a range of reliable secondary resources, applying them to strengthen the argument for crime prevention. Primary research was not conducted as that would have been a more advanced project and is not part of the academic requirement for an undergraduate level. Many different databases were used such as the internet, university databases, academic libraries, and Google scholar. Access to libraries and the internet were vital in achieving this task.

The scholarly articles were beneficial to this task as the composers of these articles had conducted detailed research themselves, allowing their information to support the point being made in this task.

Literature Review

Many areas are now trying to implement community crime prevention in order to get citizens more involved in reducing or preventing crime in their neighborhoods. The articles discuss the different techniques being used to implement this change. One main strategy is connecting the citizens to the criminals.

By doing so the citizens are able to see the results that occur when people become criminals. The three main themes explored in these articles are

  1. Youth/ juvenile violence,
  2. The social divide created between communities, and
  3. Reducing fear of crime

The philosophy of Robert Peel that “the police are the public and the public is the police”, is one that perfectly sums up the relationship between the police and the rest of the community. This quote suggests that law enforcement needs approval from citizens and residents of neighborhoods to perform their duties correctly.

Meaning, this requires the police to maintain an informed relationship with the community. By doing so they are reducing the reoccurrence of the themes in crime prevention mentioned above. Previously, there was not enough knowledge or resources amongst communities to raise awareness or organize crime prevention programs for juveniles. Today, schools together with police and community-based workers are aiming to provide the expertise to help create crime prevention programs for juveniles.

It is believed that one of the most active crime prevention strategies is effective intervention programs. A substantial number of crimes among adolescence are detected from anti-social behaviors. Youth need to be more involved in their community activities such as church-associated groups, sports clubs, and recreation centers. Other school organizations such as ‘Links to Learning’ helps adolescents engage in activities that will teach worthy skills for future work and careers.

All these extracurricular activities will give youth less time to consider committing crimes and more time to become involved in the community. The National Crime Prevention 1999 quotes "an improved understanding of the early childhood origins of juvenile delinquency highlights the opportunities for prevention programs”. One of the limitations of creating community-based crime prevention and linking the citizens to crime and criminals is that it creates social divisions between citizens.

Usually, the higher and middle-class citizens are involved in a community project and the lower-class citizens are left out. This makes the lower class citizens inferior and targeted for being the ones who are expected to commit acts of crime. This creates a division of ‘us’ (higher class) and ‘them’ (lower class). Suggests “situational crime prevention approach may displace crime, tends to benefit middle and upper classes at the expense of the poor people and may increase the fear of crime.

It also may create a siege mentality, isolating individuals and families. He then further states that complaints, of disturbances, made to the police are not always filed. Firstly, the police are given the authority to decide whether the complaint is serious enough, secondly, if the victim and criminal have met before and finally judging by the victim's social class. In order to effectively reduce crime, relationships between communities and local authorities need to be addressed. The presence of police may be quite contradictory to residents, it can be comforting for some but disturbing for others.

If residents are not aware of measures being taken by police to help prevent crime, they cannot assume their presence is positive but rather understand that more crime is occurring. This will further increase the fear in residents caused by the occurrence of criminal activity in their neighborhoods. One resident of Hyde Park describes her lifestyle to have become based upon fear. Since her home was broken into 3 years ago, a gun is always present beside her through the night; the TV is on the entire time she is at home and an alarm system has been installed.

The extreme fear is shown in these extra precautions, “When I come home late at night, I always blow my horn before I get out of the car, so I make sure that a neighbour is looking out. When I sleep at night, there are at least three lights on.”. Complaints have been made to the police, however not knowing the severity of the case; no serious action has been taken. This, again, clearly shows a lack of communication between authorities and their neighborhoods.

Findings

It is very clear from the above review that great measures are being taken to try and reduce or even eliminate crime within communities. Law enforcement authorities originally would address crime; however, today citizens are becoming more active and involved in keeping their own communities safe. The results of the first theme, youth/juvenile violence, found that this violence originated from childhood behaviors and therefore should be addressed at these early stages. In doing so crimes committed by youth should be minimized. The main notion believed to reduce youth violence is ‘diversion’. Creating a distraction or alternative for youth is the only way to keep them from winding up face-to-face with the criminal justice system.

This idea argued that juvenile offenders who are placed before the justice system are done more harm than good and are more likely to re-offend. On the other hand, diversions such as sporting activities or after-school programs need to be created. These diversions will keep the minds of these ‘adults in the making’ off negative thoughts to commit crimes. Detective Sergeant Heslop (1991), agreeing with the notion of diversion, states “Often there is little point in punishing an offender, as the punishment can be shown to be counterproductive.

By charging them we are often condemning them to further and deeper involvement in the juvenile justice system, which is, it is submitted, a failure. ” He also goes on to say that diversion is the greatest prevention tool and if used appropriately law enforcement can battle juvenile crime more efficiently. The next discussion was the social divide created within the communities when trying to implement crime prevention. Not all citizens were eager to work side by side with police to manage criminal activity.

Studies show that people with higher levels of wealth and quality of life are more likely to cooperate with the police as they have more to lose. However, the rest of the general public, those classified to have lower levels of wealth and standards of living, were reluctant to become involved as they didn’t have much to lose and were viewed as those more likely to commit crimes. This divide within the community allowed citizens of the higher class to feel a sense of empowerment through their involvement with the police and once again created isolation for those individuals classified as a part of the lower social class.

However, the people of the lower social class can also be to blame. It is asserted by Podolefsky that generally when crimes are committed and no action is taken, liability is placed upon the police. Community members prefer to abuse authorities rather than cooperate and help put criminals away. The final theme discussed is reducing the fear of crime in citizens. Findings show that people are afraid for their safety and do not want to be victims of crime. As a result of this fear, the rates of crimes are increasing.

In order to relieve this fear people started using different methods to defend themselves such as carrying guns, knives, and other protective weapons. Ward also proves this as “almost all residents and business owners interviewed either formally or informally owned guns and kept them nearby, ready for use. ” Police are given the primary role of fighting crime and are expected to “eliminate all evil in society so that the ‘good citizen’ can live in freedom without living fear”.

But to give this role to police solely and not have community crime prevention programs will not guarantee reducing crime within communities and furthermore not reduce fear of crime.

Discussion

The main point for discussion in this research paper is that community development is a necessary approach to addressing crime and promoting justice in our nation. Over the years, police were given the main responsibility to deal with crime; however, the development of a community approach will allow members to engage in addressing social issues such as crime. This approach also gives members a responsibility to help maintain a safe living location. As pointed out by Acosta and Chavis “In the community development approach, community members are responsible for solving community problems; to meet this responsibility, community members are given a voice and collective power to influence decisions and social outcomes that will affect their lives. ” Some authors argue the effectiveness of an approach involving community crime prevention.

The National Crime Prevention Framework believes this approach has proved to be effective, with outcomes such as:

  • Reducing crime and other concerning problems within the community,
  • Increased safety and unity lead to less victimization,
  • More emotional and psychological support for those who have been victims of crime,
  • Reducing crimes by those who have previously offended or been engaged in antisocial behavior.

The efficiency of allowing the public to participate in the decision-making related to crime is also shown through the great outcomes achieved in the youth discipline.

Partnerships were created with local universities that resulted in service-learning programs and continuous student internships which were important in establishing students’ careers by putting them on the right path. Another great accomplishment was that students were achieving better results in school and their behaviors and negative attitudes were definitely improving. An important outcome as clarified by Pickens was “increasing youth’s awareness about risky behavior, violence, weapons, drugs, and alcohol”, which was said to be the major motivation for all the other improvements.

A topic that has been mentioned by various authors is the amount of government involvement in community crime prevention. It is suggested by the Australian Institute of Criminology that first and foremost the government can help to minimize crime, “Governments can address factors that influence the opportunities for crime to occur through its various responsibilities in areas such as managing public space and building design, providing community recreational services and developing policies that affect local businesses and urban development processes. Furthermore, Greenberg and Rohe indicate “the physical design and appearance of a community (i.e., structural assets) affect criminal access”. Consequently, by developing safer public places governments can begin to create safer public environments. The articles and supporting documents used to assemble this research report were generally discussing very similar aspects of community crime prevention.

Topics included juvenile crime prevention, the fear of crime that has been developing in citizens, and the community crime prevention strategies that were being used to reduce and prevent crime within neighborhoods. To increase the effectiveness of these approaches further research should be conducted in the areas of government participation. To take community crime prevention to the next level, local government should consider formalizing or enforcing requirements that must be met by all citizens. All citizens should be expected to be involved in creating a safer and combined community.

Conclusion

Summing up, the involvement of community members in prime prevention is an effective technique. With the help of schools, police, and citizens crime has been reduced in youth, fear of crime has been minimized and social relationships strengthened. More communities should be encouraged to implement more strategies involving their citizens. A final thought is whether governments should consider enforcing community crime prevention in all areas to enable safer living environments.

Cite this Page

Research Paper: Crime Prevention Strategies. (2017, Jul 13). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/research-paper-crime-prevention-strategies/

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer