An Important Role in the Development of Nationalist And Pan-American Movements that Had an Impact on World History
Africans from the U.S. and the Caribbean were instrumental in the development of nationalist and Pan-Africanist movements which would influence world history. From the initial Pan-African Congress in Chicago in 1893 to the First Pan-African Conference of 1900 in London, people from the Caribbean and the U.S. played a leading role. Historically, the first pan-African movement, founded in the late 19th century, was a search for a common identity: 'pan-Negrism'. The aim was to unite black people across the world in order to fight slavery and colonialism. Pioneers were Edward Blyden, WEB Dubois, Stokely Carmichael, and Kwame Nkrumah.
Pan-Africanism is known as an ideology and movement that encourages the solidarity of all Africans worldwide. It is based on the belief that unity is vital to the socioeconomic and political progress of Africa/Africans and aims to unify and uplift all peoples of African descent. Pan-Africanism is the principle and advocacy of the political union. The Pan-African Movement of the next century faces the reality that it cannot be defined by biological, genetic, or racial categories, but rather in terms of its politics and social vision. Race, in the eyes of the movement, is a category of anti-black exploitation, a product of slavery, white supremacy, and economic domination. Racial challenges that we face today not only attack this idea but attack the humanity of an entire spectrum of people. The movement against racism has more than ever extended to a globally international level.
It is apparent for real-life knowledge such as this to be absorbed, especially when analyzing the future of the movement. Although the Pan-African Movement was initially started for African Americans to globalize themselves and gain equality, the movement hasn’t stopped since for better or worse. The future of Pan-Africanism is greatly detailed in Pan-Africanism and Education by Kenneth James King and The Pan-African Movement by Imanuel Geiss. The words from King are intuitive and significant as he speaks of the fight Africans took for a proper education system. And secondly, Geiss speaks on the struggles experienced in Pan-Africanism and it rightfully represents the complexities of black political and intellectual thought over two hundred years. What constitutes Pan-Africanism, what one might include in a Pan-African movement often changes according to whether the focus is on multiple politics, ideologies, organizations, or cultures. This sense of interconnected pasts and futures has taken many forms, especially in the creation of political institutions overall.
Order custom essay An Important Role in the Development of Nationalist And Pan-American Movements that Had an Impact on World History with free plagiarism report
450+ experts on 30 subjects
Starting from 3 hours delivery
One of the key ingredients to the Pan-African movement in today’s age is the public policy that it revolves around, and that is the wealth and/or poverty that’s been stricken for the last few decades. The policy’s purpose is to examine the development of the movement’s growth and increase in terms of public and government advocacy. It also measures the grand scheme of financial movement as the original motive for the Pan-African movement was to strengthen the unity and empowerment of the black community all around. As of late, the movement has built a reputation of diverging into the pockets of lacking communities and using the monies to their advantage. Also, there are rumors concerning dictatorship becoming a popular tool to galvanize individuals and even siding with infamous dictators who are currently in power. This definitely speaks against not only what the Pan-African movement is all about, but also the collective reasoning to protect its wealth.
The Business, Government, and Society model is imperative as it details the underlining factors of the Pan-African movement and its impact. The problems of stealing money are still relevant as the citizens of Africa feel helpless due to the lack of a successful economy within the country. To better put it, a lot of people aren’t as confident on standing up for themselves and facing the challenges of the Pan-African movement since they’re not financially in control of their environment. Additionally, the people of Africa lean towards the revelation that the movement is compromised as the leaders have sided with newly dictatorship in the last few decades. It tends to be overwhelming to the African public as they become powerless to make any real change.
In essence, this currently is the best representation of the BGS model because it describes the actuality of things that have transpired and for the most part, sets the expectation for what is to come. This doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll continue to be like this, but it’s the conclusion that most likely will happen in the near future. The social responsibility aspect of the Pan-African movement was fascinating as they catered to a suffering group of people who needed leaders and community to lead the way to a peaceful life. The movement, as stated before, would get involved with the public voice as well as make political moves that would impact their environment tremendously. At one point, families were comfortable with investing into the areas around them knowing that the Pan-African movement would always support the conscientious effort to back them up financially and physically.
Africans used to go to local markets and not feel endangered of their livelihood as well as allowing their children to freely walk to schools without crime occurring. Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a deep sense of positive gain on social responsibility now-a-days since the Pan-African movement has seemingly been compromised of their intentions and goals to make change in their society. As of recent, there’s been a negative connection to social responsibility as we all know it. Ethically, I think anyone can see what’s wrong with the picture of the Pan-African movement and its stake with the people of Africa. It just doesn’t seem ethical to have a government of an entire country that cannot establish themselves rightfully in the face of its citizens and stand up for what’s right.
It’s also not ethical to allow the people to suffer from the compromising residue of an establish movement intended to help, not to hurt. Most of all, it’s unethical that the public cannot have any support system or ally from any other country to fully revitalize its peacemaking, economy, construction, businesses, and education systems. For anyone that has contributed to help Africa, I fully give credit to every individual. However, I do think there are ethical issues when all we hear is both millionaires and celebrities making contributions and we never hear anything more sustainable than that. Even in the midst of this research, I still find it hard to believe at this juncture there is anything ethical about what’s happening, including the lack of pure and genuine motive from the Pan-African movement.
On a national scale this is a wakeup call for the United States. Americans have long suffered from racial inequality in the last century or more, and it’s something we are still struggling with. Although we have moved away from slavery and critical times in history where the average black man couldn’t even step foot out of their house, it has evolved into a larger scale now as the judicial system seems to lack proper judgment in the eyes of the minority. What’s magnifying is that even if there is national notoriety of racial inequality, it is still ignored because we are prepositioned to believe a suited police officer is always equipped to make the best judgement calls in emergency cases. Clearly that’s not the case. I also think this affects international entities in a way that when poverty is known to define Africa for so long, and other governments know the compromise of the country’s ethical standards, they don’t want to engage in any business with them.
It builds a large disconnect with the world because these are obvious avenues of revenue that can flow through the country, but unfortunately don’t. I’m sure Africa has an enormous amount of resources, goods, and services that can highly benefit other countries that are fixated on growing their own economy. The potential reaches to the ceiling for Africa. It’s definitely an unfair situation for the African people and those who still have faith in the Pan-African movement. In terms of diversity and basic rights, it’s almost instinctive to believe there hasn’t been much improvement in both areas due to no supporting party of Africa and its people. Pan-Africanism was supposed to be the catalyst of government, economical, diverse, and public change that would’ve categorized them as a country that is beyond self-sufficient. With the current dictatorship, it’s safe to say there isn’t any rights for any one person trying to make a living.
Me, personally, I don’t see a realistic change happening anytime soon. But, it’s not indicative to a constant way of life in the future. The possibility of an honest difference happening is to have a group of Christians who not only understand racial issues, but have a source of hope to provide to those in Africa that might not see it. Forgive me for being so direct with a religious belief. However, I’ve seen great changes in other countries who I’m sure have their own poverty. I’ve also seen churches from the United States that have walked into dangerous international areas and contributed to families by giving fresh food, water, house remodeling, school resources, and much more. The benefit of having such group is to give life to a down-and-out Pan-African movement that essentially was originated to help African communities as a whole.
Not to mention, Christians are notorious for their advancement in non-violence which ups the ante in terms of international and national business engagement. This helps other governments get involved by noticing long periods of a self-sustaining, non-violence that has become capable of stepping foot into economic grounds. The only barriers I see with this approach is the scrutiny Christianity has underwent for hundreds of years, the lack of knowing what the faith is about and who Jesus is in Africa’s culture. It might be a difficult task entering into a foreign land to intentionally speak to current and former leaders about what they need to do different to help the country overall.
They’re possibly setting themselves up for failure in a worldview visual. In contrast to that, Christians have leverage as they know what it means to be attacked during their time in history and can share that with the Pan-African movement as the Christian groups bring a renewed inspiration. It all boils down to a matter of choice for a few leaders in the movement since they might still have influence over other powerful leaders and communities around them. Essentially, it’s all still possible again for the Pan- African movement to flip the script and provide Africa a new landscape of change again. In the event of anything truly happening, we will eventually see!
Cite this Page
An Important Role in the Development of Nationalist And Pan-American Movements that Had an Impact on World History. (2023, Feb 13). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/an-important-role-in-the-development-of-nationalist-and-pan-american-movements-that-had-an-impact-on-world-history/
Run a free check or have your essay done for you
