The Different Factors Affecting Acceptance
Acceptance is allowing people to think their own thoughts without having the desire to change them. People throughout society have struggled and continue to struggle with comprehending this concept. Each piece discussed contains specific differences between parties, examples of showing or not showing acceptance, and the viewpoints of the authors on this idea.
Specific differences explained in each piece having to do with acceptance are examples useful in understanding this concept. One difference articulated in a majority opinion by the Supreme Court is the issue of preserving “the flag’s special role" (Brennan 16). The Texas v. Johnson majority opinion describes most of the justices’ opinions in one piece of writing. Throughout this writing, the author takes on a dignified tone, displaying respectfulness and formalness. The diction of the author includes phrases such as “fortified in today’s conclusion” and “resilience that we reassert today.” This proper tone, purposeful diction and thoughtful syntax creates a strong, logical argument that can be clearly understood by the reader.
Order custom essay The Different Factors Affecting Acceptance with free plagiarism report
450+ experts on 30 subjects
Starting from 3 hours delivery
Moreover, Sergei and Yonatan in the short story “What, of This Goldfish, Would You Wish?” by Edgar Keret have several apparent differences in character. Sergei Goralick is an old Russian man plagued with the darkness of loneliness, while Yonatan is a young, charismatic boy eager to make a documentary about the wishes of people. These opposing characteristics also make Sergei annoyed when Yonatan comes knocking on his door. Sergei does not “much like strangers knocking on his door” (Keret 5). This is direct characterization given by the author, which helps to show how opposite Sergei and Yoni are. Sergei is not open to strangers, but Yoni is willing to knock on every door he sees. Both Etgar Keret and William Brennan articulate prominent distinctions within their pieces, and demonstrate contrasting judgments throughout them.
Along with specific differences, another key component of the enigma that is acceptance is identifying how people do or do not show acceptance. In the video taking place in Gaza, each person involved in the situation experiences a series of emotions. At the beginning of the scene, a young boy throws a rock at a police van, and this rock was loud enough to startle the police. The ones inside of the van get out and capture the boy. Imagine a mother being completely unaware of this situation and she finds out about it, but just as her son is being taken away. This is precisely what happens in the video. The mother is not accepting of these circumstances, and the police are not accepting of the citizens trying to interfere. A policeman makes himself seem very intimidating, using authoritative body language, and even goes so far as to push a woman.
His actions are obviously not accepting whatsoever. The whole video is full of aggressive body language and actions. Additionally, during the Texas v. Johnson Supreme Court case, all of the justices were in debate. At the end of it, the justices concluded that a person has the right to burn the American flag “by the closest possible margin of a 5-to-4 vote" (Allen 18). The fact that this outcome was as close as it possibly could be shows that acceptance, along with allowing people to have their own views, can be highly controversial. The Texas v. Johnson case has many examples of acceptance, the ones that believe flag burning is okay, and non-acceptance, the ones that believe flag burners should be criminally punished. Legal decisions, as well as social conflicts, are clear illustrations of people being accepting or not.
Specific differences and examples of acceptance or non-acceptance are imperative in exploring this concept, and so are the authors’ views. Authors are supposed to express opinions in editorials, which is what Ronald J. Allen did. On the issue of burning the American flag, he suggests that the people should “let the controversy rage." Allen also states that with this controversy comes “debate, enlightenment, and renewed commitment.” When the author writes this, he recognizes that there will always be large conflict and division of the people, and acceptance coming from everyone will never truly be reached. The author does not think that non-acceptance is a bad thing, either.
Like he stated, controversy and debate brings enlightenment. William J. Brennan discusses this idea as well, saying that people who burn the flag should not be punished, but the solution to this problem is to “persuade them that they are wrong” (Brennan 16). He also considers the fact that flags can be burned, but nothing can affect the meaning of the flag that is stored in the hearts of the American people. Both Brennan and Allen understand every point-of-view of the average American person concerned with the issue of flag burning, and both authors use formal language to communicate their views in the most logical and effective way possible. The viewpoints of the authors are significant when trying to convey an argument on a vision such as acceptance.
The concept of acceptance can be infinitely explored and supported with endless pieces of evidence. Whether it be Sergei judging Yonatan, a woman in turmoil due to her precious son being captured by the police, or existential debate over the subject of flag burning, different examples and different viewpoints of the acceptance conundrum are found all over society. However, Barbara Jordan is clear in expressing the overall goal. “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.”
The Different Factors Affecting Acceptance. (2023, Mar 15). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/the-different-factors-affecting-acceptance/Cite this Page
Run a free check or have your essay done for you
