The Barriers and Drivers of Sustainable Transport Management in the University of Hertfordshire

Introduction and Background

Over the past few decennaries, the term ‘sustainability’ has become rather omnipresent and has been used in our day-to-day lives, in the building, power and energy, economic, conveyance, and agricultural sectors, etc. The term which is defined in the Oxford lexicon as ‘the ability to be maintained at a certain degree can be said to be a planning construct that constitutes something of a revolution as it has become the accelerator for persons and organizations around the universe who are making the greatest societal alteration of our clip.

Province that following the Brundtland Commission study in 1987, planetary attendance referring to sustainable development has increased, and faculty members and policy authorities have tried to use the construct in urban and metropolitan conditions. Sustainable development has demonstrated a lasting and persuasive impression as it directs policy in a distinguishable, natural way while keeping the ability to set to new issues and economic, societal, and technological conditions. In this reappraisal, the chief focal point is sustainable transit and the challenges encountered.

Order custom essay The Barriers and Drivers of Sustainable Transport Management in the University of Hertfordshire with free plagiarism report

450+ experts on 30 subjects Starting from 3 hours delivery

Get Essay Help

The University of Hertfordshire is based in Hatfield, in the county of Hertfordshire, and has about 27,725 pupils including more than 2,000 international pupils from over 85 different states, 2358 staff, and a turnover of more than 230 million. The University has a figure of sites beyond College lane and de Havilland which are the two chief campuses. These sites are; Bayfordbury, Angerland Park and Ride, Bio Park, The Field Centre, College lane North, Meridian House, Titan Court, and MacLaurin Building.

1.1 Sustainable Conveyance

Harmonizing to Black, composing about sustainable conveyance has become slippery because there are changing positions on the definition of the term, he states that in accomplishing sustainable transit, the conveyance sector would utilize renewable resources at a gait that does non excel the gait at which the resources are renewed, it would utilize non-renewable resources in a mode non transcending the rate of development of alternate resources; and the degree which the conveyance sector releases pollutants is less than the capacity of the environment to absorb them. Sustainable travel is a cardinal issue within the University sector, hence as a portion of the sustainability Programme, the demand to undertake the effects of travel of both staff and pupils has been acknowledged.

It is in this position that Hensher states that bettering public conveyance is a manner of contending the lifting rates of traffic congestion, the decrease in the quality of the air, and planetary heating.

In his research, Black points out that there are assorted issues environing sustainable conveyance. The first facet of sustainable conveyance is how 97 % of the conveyance sector depends chiefly on crude oil which is a resource that is limited, secondly, he talks about how sustainable travel is focused on the environment and as such trades with pollution including the high degrees of nursery gases being emitted into the ambiance which increases the wellness hazards of people shacking in urban parts, the writer so goes farther to state that the environmental component of sustainability is “a double-edged sword” that will non merely harm major countries of human life but will besides damage the lives of the coming coevals. Third Black argues that the conveyance system has a job of traffic congestion affecting both nomadic congestion and stationary congestion whereby there are limited parking infinities.

Due to the addition in the population of staff and pupils in the higher instruction sector over the past decennary, the impact of commutation has become the largest a University has on the environment and as such should not be taken for granted.

The form of auto usage in Universities matches that of wider society and is perchance made worse by the alterations in the higher instruction sector itself. The rise in the figure of pupils that ain autos can be said to be likely caused by the addition in the admittance of mature pupils while there is a deficit of available residential adjustment on campus.

1.2 Drivers and Barriers to Sustainable Conveyance

In today’s society, there is a sense of societal and economic promotion attached to the ownership of autos Hensher points out that there is an unsatisfying demand for the ownership of autos. Governments are seeking to happen a balance between the assorted manners of conveyance, looking for ways of setting public transit into a place that reduces auto dependence in urban parts.

However, Davis draws attending to environmental rules and ends to command some of the challenges faced by sustainable transit. He argues that well-deserved attending is now being given to parking ordinances as a really effective control step. Black besides highlighted that most of the methods for managing jobs of congestion on the main roads have no cost deductions to the driving public as they are demand direction techniques.

Looking at some of the barriers to sustainable transit Zuniga stated that some of the barriers to active travel are distance, conditions, and safety. Besides during research carried out by Koetse and Rietveld, looking at the impact of clime alteration and conditions on conveyance, they stated that there is a decrease in the usage of bikes and an addition in auto usage as an agency of transposing during the winter season.

The University of Leicester states that accepting and minimizing the usage of dodo fuel will help the University in maintaining up with statute law, stakeholder’s increasing involvements, the of all time lifting monetary values of energy every bit good as aid the University to run efficaciously in a green economic system.

The Higher Education sector has become a competitive sector, and Universities need to upgrade their installations to remain competitive and to be successful. This might do the travel forms of members of the Universities to alter, and the Travel program is of import in cut downing the effects caused by the alterations.

From the literature above it is clear that it is of import to understand the drivers and barriers to the acceptance of sustainable conveyance, and this applies in any context, including workplaces such as Universities, and the University of Hertfordshire – hence so sets the scene and principle for this survey. The aims of this research are as follows:

1. To set up the current province of bing cognition and literature on drivers and barriers to the acceptance of sustainable conveyance.

2. To garner and collate bing information on conveyance forms at the University of Hertfordshire to help in placing the alterations in the primary manner of conveyance from 2002 to 2013 and set up future marks of the University to increase the usage of sustainable manners of conveyance.

3. To place any possible drivers and barriers apparent in the form of information sets.

Methodology

This research has looked at sustainable transit at the University of Hertfordshire, concentrating on the drivers and barriers to sustainability at the university. The research was carried out utilizing qualitative research methods, where secondary research was done and explorative research techniques were used.

In transporting out this research, literature reappraisals and a professional audience were carried out. In the literature reappraisal, a geographic expedition of academic diaries, travel programs from other UK universities, and professional websites was done in order to set up the current state of affairs on the drivers and barriers of sustainable transit and how it affects the University sector in relation to objectives 1 and 2.

Secondary information was collected from the University of Hertfordshire’s Travel program to acquire study consequences on the primary manner of conveyance of both the staff and the pupils of the University between 2002 and 2013. This was done in order to analyze the alteration in the travel behavior of both the staff and pupils of the University over the 11 twelvemonth period in relation to the objective. Analysis was carried out on the extracted information, looking at the alterations in primary manners of conveyance and proposing grounds for the alterations.

Besides information was collected to set up future marks of the University to increase the usage of sustainable manners of conveyance.

Search cardinal words like sustainability, sustainable travel, sustainable conveyance in universities, green campuses, and sustainable transit, were used in the hunt for relevant literature utilizing the university’s online library and Google Scholar. Forward and rearward mention-seeking techniques were besides adopted.

The research was mostly a desk-based survey pulling upon bing literature and information.

Consequences

In order to analyze the travel forms of members of UH, information was extracted from the UH Travel program of 2013-2018. A travel study is normally carried out between March and April biennially and in 2013 all members of staff and the pupils were invited to take a portion of the study. However, merely 20 % of the staff and 1 % of the pupils completed the study. The consequences are as follows:

Primary Mode of Transport for staff in 2013

From Figure 3.1 above, it can be seen that the most used manner of transit for members of staff in UH is auto at 69 %, and this involves members of staff that thrust to the University on their ain ( individual tenancy vehicles ). The 2nd highest manner of transposing for staff is the auto-sharing method which is much more sustainable than the remarkable usage of vehicles and this takes 8 %, both coach usage and walking portion about the same per centum of staff at 6 %.

The per centum of staff that rhythm to the university is 5 %, while members of staff that commute by train are 4 %. The big per centum of auto usage amongst the staff may be due to assorted grounds including, the demand to transport work-related points around, won't, distance from place to the university, holding multiple undertakings to accomplish within an individual trip, etc.

Primary Mode of Transport for staff between 2002 and 2013

In Figure 3.2 above, the usage of individual tenancy vehicles as a primary agency of transposing amongst the staff has reduced from 82 % in 2002 to 69 % in 2013. The per centum of staff that uses the coach as their primary signifier of transit when transposing to and from the University had somewhat increased from 5 % in 2002 to 6 % in 2013.

There has been an addition in train usage among staff, which was 4 % in 2013 from 1 % in 2002; the per centum of staff auto sharing has besides experienced an overall addition from 3 % in 2002 to 8 % in 2013. Cycling among members of staff has besides increased from 2 % in 2002 to 5 % in 2013, nevertheless even though walking has fluctuated over the old ages between 2002 and 2013, it has remained the same at 6 %. The alteration in the travel form of members of staff may hold been due to either wellness grounds, fiscal grounds, or the increased consciousness of sustainability in general.

Primary Mode of Transport for pupils in 2013

Figure 3.3 above shows that walking is the most popular manner of transit for pupils of UH at 43 %, this may be because a high figure of pupils lives in the residential adjustments provided by the University on campus, and happen it is much easier to acquire to their categories. However 31 % of pupils drive to the University on their ain which is every bit high, the per centum of pupils that commute by coach is 14 % followed by the per centum of pupils that prefer to the auto portion which is 5 %. Finally the per centum of Students that rhythm and those that commute by train is comparatively low at 3 % each.

Primary Mode of Transport for pupils between 2002 and 2013

Figure 3.4 above indicates that walking is the most popular signifier of conveyance among the pupils, addition by a sum of 13 % between 2002 ( where it was 30 % ) and 2013 ( 43 % ). The usage of individual tenancy vehicles decreased from 38 % in 2002 to 31 % in 2013, and the per centum of pupils that use the coach as their primary signifier of transit reduced from 19 % in 2002 to 14 % in 2013.

The usage of trains as a signifier of conveyance among pupils has remained the same at 3 %, while auto-sharing among pupils has increased over the same period of a clip from 2 % in 2002 to 5 % in 2013. Finally, there was a little decrease in the usage of cycling by pupils from 4 % to 3 % between 2002 and 2013 severally. These alterations in the primary signifiers of conveyance to more sustainable signifiers may hold been influenced by the high costs of keeping personal vehicles due to the economic state of affairs or parking limitations by the university on pupils.

Discussion

One of the chief benefits of placing the travel forms of the members of the University every bit good as the barriers faced by the University in cut downing the per centum of auto usage among both staff and pupils is that it gives a more elaborate analysis on what primary manners of conveyance are more popular and besides gives a thought as to why these manners are largely used.

From the research, it can be deduced that some of the drivers of sustainable conveyance include; authorities' statute law, reputational benefits ( green image ), fiscal benefits, and environmental impacts. It can besides be said that some of the barriers to sustainable conveyance are; unfavorable conditions, distance, societal position, safety, and won't among others, these could besides be attributed to the University of Hertfordshire.

However, the University has made further programs to cut down auto usage most significantly as other signifiers of transit are more flexible in footings of existing modal split. The University of Hertfordshire marks to cut down individual tenancy auto usage amongst members of staff from 69 % in 2013 to 60 % by 2018, besides increasing other manners of conveyance including auto-sharing, walking, cycling, and the usage of public conveyance from 31 % in 2013 to 40 % by 2018.

For pupil commuter journeys, the University aims to cut down individual tenancy auto usage from 22 % in 2013 to 20 % by 2018, and to increase auto-sharing, walking, cycling, and the usage of public conveyance from 78 % in 2013 to 80 % by 2018. In add-on the University purposes to accomplish an average split of 7 % for individual tenancy auto usage and 93 % for the usage of sustainable manners of conveyance for pupils populating the residential subdivision of the College Lane Campus.

Decision

The aims of this research were to set up the current province of bing cognition and literature on the drivers and barriers to the acceptance of sustainable transit, to garner and collate bing informations on conveyance forms at the University of Hertfordshire and set up future marks, besides to place any possible drivers and barriers apparent in the form of bing informations.

Mentions:

1. Black, W. R. ( 2000 ) ‘Socio-economic barriers to sustainable transport’ ,Journal of Transport Geography,8, pp. 141-147.
2. Daly, H. E. ( 1991 ) ‘Steady State Economies’ . Island Press, Washington, DC.
3. Davis, A. L. ( 1996 ) ‘Promoting sustainable conveyance on England: rules and practice’ ,Journal of Transport Geography,4 ( 1 ) , pp. 67-70.
4. Edwards, A. R. ( 2005 ) .The sustainability revolution: Portrayal of a paradigm displacement. New Society Pub.
5. Goldman, T. and Gorham, R. ( 2006 ) ‘Sustainable urban conveyance: Four advanced directions’Technology in Society, 28, pp. 261-273.
6. Goodwin, P.B. , Hallett, S. , Kenny, F. and Stokes, G. ( 1991 ) ‘Transport: the new realism’ ,Report to Rees Jeffrey Road Fund, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford.
7. Greene, D. L. , Wegener, M. ( 1997 ) ‘Sustainable transport’ ,Journal of Transport Geography, 5 ( 3 ) , 177-190.
8. Hensher, D. A. ( 1993 ) ‘Socially and environmentally appropriate urban hereafters for the motor auto Transportation’ ,Conveyance Policy,20 ( 1 ) , pp. 1-20.
9. Hensher, D. A. ( 1998 ) ‘The instability between auto and public conveyance usage in urban Australia: why does it be? ’ ,Conveyance Policy,5, pp. 193-204.
10. Oxford lexicon, 2014.
11. Tolley, R. ( 1996 ) . Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of transposing.Journal of Transport Geography,4( 3 ) , 213-217.
12. Transport Research Laboratory, ( 1994 ) ‘Impact of Transport Policies in Five Cities’ PR 107, TRL, Crowthorne.

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

Check my essay Hire Writer