Movement in Architecture

Motion in Architecture

How can the Architectural Promenade Create Experiences Which Heighten Our Connection to Construct Environment?

“I see obviously how external images influence the image that I call my organic structure: they transmit motion to it.And I besides see how this organic structure influences external images: it gives back motion to them.”

– Henri Bergson

Contentss

Contentss

Glossary

Introduction

Motion of Body in Space

Decision Making In Movement

Formulation of Movement Criteria

Illustrations

Mentions

Glossary

Motion

The act or procedure of traveling people or things from one topographic point or place to another.

Architectural Promenade

The experience of walking through a edifice. The complex web of thoughts which underpins Le Corbusier’s work, most specifically his belief in architecture as a signifier of induction. [ 1 ]

Emanation

An organized group or line of people or vehicles that move together easy as portion of a ceremonial.

Parkour

The activity or athletics of traveling quickly through an country, typically in an urban environment, negociating obstructions by running, jumping, and mounting.

Introduction

This paper seeks to research how, through design designers can heighten the users experience in the built environment through motion and the architectural promenade.

Our organic structures are an inordinately good designed mechanism and an astoundingly complex piece of technology. It has been advanced and enhanced through development – and we are intended to travel. The environment we choose to bring forth around this chef-d’oeuvre merits the topmost imaginable degree of consideration. The manner we inhabit the reinforced environment replicates our capableness and the longing for our organic structures to travel and brood. Architecture has ever been designed with motion in head, whether it is knowing or unwilled. This thesis aims to analyze and uncover the legion ways our organic structures move within the built environment and look into how architecture and design can suit or order human motion.

The focal point of my survey will be on the design of museums as this provides a great penetration into the ways worlds move and make determinations within the reinforced environment. From the public place to the bosom of the exhibition infinites, museums provide a phase for human motion within architecture.

Motion of Body in Space

Harmonizing to Robert Yudell the interaction between the sphere of our organic structures and the sphere of our home topographic points is invariably in gesture. Whether we are cognizant or inexperienced person of this procedure, our organic structures and our motions are in eternal duologue with our edifices. The critical interaction of organic structure signifier and motion with architecture deserves our careful attending as designers. [ 2 ]

Motion and emanation has been cardinal to the preparation of the built environment dating as far back as antediluvian Egypt, Greece and Roman architecture. In peculiar when it comes to sacred or ritual infinites. Many of the techniques designers use in modern twenty-four hours design to advance motion day of the month back to the methods used in the yesteryear. For illustration in the Temple of Khons in ancient Egypt the usage of visible radiation, threshold and fluctuation in degrees non merely defined the infinite but besides the emanation through the infinite. Architects such as Philip Johnson and Le Corbusier have studied this emanation or promenade to make more piquant architecture in modern times.

Through promotion in engineerings adult male is “moving” faster and farther than of all time before, but this motion is chiefly a inactive experience unlike the piquant architecture of Le Corbusier in early modernist times. Our organic structures are being moved or propelled in infinite instead than physically traveling ourselves. In kernel we are really sing less active motion in the horizontal and perpendicular planes than of all time before. Yudell describes this as frozen and drifting organic structures. This construct differentiates between the self-

motion of a organic structure or the displaced organic structure that is moved by other agencies such as a vehicle or lift. We rely on the displaced motion of our organic structures to go greater distance but one may oppugn if we are going excessively reliant on these methods and as such going brainsick or alienated from our environments as we simply pass through infinite by mechanical agencies.

The Futurist Movement is an utmost illustration of this disaffection from the universe and our experience of architecture around us. One of their visions promised entire freedom of life on an space gridded platform into which we may stop up for energy, information or alimentary demands. This scenario nevertheless embodies a clear denial of the demand for the interaction of organic structure and architecture. It provides no landmarks, no stimulation, no phases, and no Centres. [ 3 ] Changes in engineering has meant that some of these futurist thoughts have been implemented at a smaller degree. Our motion within the built environment has become progressively inactive due to ordinances for handiness and in some instances for pure convenience. It is our occupation as designers to turn to this deficiency of battle and inactive motion within the built environment by making a promenade that encourages motion and geographic expedition in our milieus.

Decision Making In Movement

Le Corbusier’s premier motivation when designing was to aid people in the procedure of “savoir habiter” , cognizing how to populate [ 4 ] and it was his sentiment that the architectural promenade would be designed to “resensitise” people to their milieus. [ 5 ] In planing in this manner buildings become a series of experiences, get downing with the attack from the street, tract or square and pulling a individual indoors and in along a series of experiences in infinite. In a manner the designer becomes a type of choreographer, making infinites which anticipate a person’s motion. It creates a duologue non merely between people and the reinforced environment but besides amongst other people.

Le Corbusier strived to make infinites where people would be prompted to utilize their memory, analysis, concluding and finally formation of an grasp of his architecture, obliging them to convey their ain experience to the edifice, making something wholly new. He endeavoured to make a model in which people could populate their ain lives and do their ain determinations whilst ordering really strongly precisely what that model should be. This paradox is what makes Le Corbusier’s work so interesting. It is one of the most confusing issues of architectural pattern ; how can an architect design infinites that encourage motion without curtailing the individuals free motion within the infinite. Le Corbusier tried ( non ever successfully ) to turn to how other people may see his edifices and to underscore the message that edifices were considered as unfinished without people and their experience within.

In a less formal scene in Mikkel Rugaard’s “Street Movement” in Denmark ( which originated as a Parkour preparation company ) has attempted to turn to the thought of planing for freedom of motion and look in the reinforced environment. Rugaard attempts to specify infinites, milieus and objects in the reinforced environment to do certain they become inspirational and invitational towards physical activity and motion without compromising the architectural vision and aesthetic value. Rugaard notes that planing for motion successfully is easy but what becomes more complex and challenging is the add-on of different people who are go throughing through these infinites and how the map of those non take parting in parkour additions the complexness of design. [ 6 ]

The Gugenheim Museum in New York designed by Frank Lloyd Wright in 1959 is an illustration of a edifice that is clearly designed with a really controlled motion or promenade laid out within the edifice. The raging paseo guides the visitant up through the edifice go arounding through the whole exhibition infinite. There is no determination devising in this procedure but instead the visitant is led in one way ether up or down through the exhibition infinite. It is my purpose to analyze through instance surveies how motion can be achieved in a more intuitive manner instead than the forced nature of Frank Lloyd Wright’s work in the Guggenheim in New York. In a manner the controlling nature of the promenade within the Guggenheim is differs little from the control of motion within the futurist ideals. The visitant is non being engaged with the architecture but instead is being brought in a certain controlled way.

Formulation of Movement Criteria

In order to analyze how motion can be controlled in a museum puting it is necessary to put up a standard by which I will analyze a figure of instance surveies. This has been chiefly determined by the work of Le Corbusier and the architectural promenade. He believed that the undertaking of designers was to react to the interior “sounding board” of the human organic structure and act upon it to originate a response in the signifier of action. [ 7 ] Analyzing the standard he used focal points on the ways in which architecture can ease this procedure and as such act as a call for motion.

Believing as he did that the organic structure plays a chief portion in the soaking up of cognition Le Corbusier developed a series of techniques to incorporate this procedure. Deducing from his roof of the mouth of centripetal experiences, beat, coloring material, visible radiation and touch, he choreographed sequences of infinites that would arouse a response at the most instinctual degree. In his early work modulating lines were used to direct these distinguishable messages to the head, following this the modular adult male would lend to this project. Light and dark would add a farther degree to the stage dancing of the promenade by playing to the edifice user physiologically through the power of symbolism.

I will endeavor to analyze farther how the undermentioned sensory factors play a portion in modern architecture where engineering and even the promotion of light control can play a portion in the design and stage dancing of the modern promenade.

  • Rhythms of the Body
  • Scale
  • Sound
  • Light
  • Coloring material
  • Centripetal Stimulation

On a basic degree Le Corbusier’s promenade consists of a series of experiences in infinite utilizing texture visible radiation, memory and associations which provoke action but there is a more intricate combination of these which needs to be examined. It is how the usage of these elements together which formulates the true promenade in his edifices. Le Corbusier’s edifices can be examined from a set group of elements of his promenade but non every edifice can be examined with respect to this expression ( threshold, sensitizing anteroom, oppugning, reorientation and apogee ) therefore I have set myself the undertaking of making my ain expression or group of elements that will help my scrutiny of motion through museum infinite from past to show.

It is from analyzing these standards against current theoretical accounts of museum design will help my quest to make a more piquant and geographic expedition promoting edifice to animate people to travel and interact with their milieus instead than the somewhat displaced relationship we presently have with our environment.

Illustrations

Page

Figure

Beginning

1

Cover Image

Alexander Straulino – My First Lightbox

6

Figure 1

Produced By Writer

6

Figure 2

Ibid

6

Figure 3

Ibid

7

Figure 4

My Playground – Kasparworks

9

Figure 5

Ibid

9

Figure 6

Flavie A.Iteration Type A( 2009 )

Mentions

Samuel F. Le Corbusier & A ; the Architectural Promenade. Sheffield: Birkhauser 2010

Kent C. Bloomer, Charles W. Moore, Robert J. Yudell Body Memory & A ; Architecture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press 1977

Le Corbusier. The Marseille Block. London: Harville 1953

Menin S. & A ; Samuel F. Nature & A ; Space: Aalto and Le Corbusier. London: Routledge 2003

The Parkour Architect, picture, Flow-The Pakour Kommunity, 7 October 2012, viewed 31 October 2014 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.youtube.com/watch? v=sLWfRzgo__4 & A ; NR=1 & gt ;

×